Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

National parks are killing red gum forests

By Ken O'Brien - posted Wednesday, 7 October 2009


The NSW Department of Environment and the National Parks Service have made it very clear that local communities and jobs do not count. Their interest is only a national green agenda where country towns and small businesses are not relevant. In their view, the people have no importance and should have no say in the Forest Assessment currently being conducted by the Natural Resources Commission. Bob Carr said don’t worry about the job losses. Don’t worry about the businesses or the future of the community. And the greens aren’t worried about watching all the trees die!

But the dead and dying trees on Yanga National Park disproves any genuine interest in looking after red gum environments. The privately-managed forest across the river is managed as a healthy, sustainable, productive business that can boast credible environmental outcomes.

Forest industries produce important and valuable timber products, capture and store carbon from the atmosphere and reduce demand for high energy products that rely on burning fossil fuels. They provide jobs and an economic basis for rural and regional communities. They sustain healthy forest environments. They provide an economy that can afford sound environmental management without imposing on taxpayer funds. They ensure conservation!

Advertisement

Red gum forests need active management and multiple-use forestry on a sustainable basis to ensure good outcomes for industry, communities and the environment - all delivered as an economic activity rather than a welfare burden on taxpayers.

In the current drought, forests need to be thinned; dead or dying trees need to be removed. Management by Forests NSW over many decades and through previous droughts has proven that the forest health depends on active management. Silvicultural thinning needs to be implemented across the whole of the Riverina, including on private forests; environmental flows of water without thinning is futile. The thinning need is huge, the water need is small but they remain the only tools available to save the red gum forests.

Benign neglect by the Department of Environment and the National Parks Service has proven simply that they are not capable of looking after these forests. Yanga National Park must be returned to active management before it all dies.

We do not need any more national parks in our red gum forests.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ken O’Brien is a New South Wales Forest Products Association member.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy