Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Interest rates, the flow of funds and perhaps - by default - Armageddon

By James Cumes - posted Tuesday, 22 September 2009


We have gutted our industries, accumulated massive debts, become the most obsessive gamblers in human history and the goals we alleged were our purpose have never been reached. Indeed, all we have done is to score the most startling series of "own -goals" in economic and financial history. Those goals scored against ourselves are already having social, political and strategic consequences going far beyond those revealed in the fluctuations of the Dow or the collapse of individual banks. They go to the survival of the sort of global community we have claimed to be trying to create since the end of World War II.

Let us have a closer look at some of the more "technical" issues and, in particular, at interest rates and the flow of funds.

The empirical evidence on the impact of interest-rate hikes seems overwhelming. More than 60 years ago, Keynes seemed to view such hikes much as I do. He was ignored so it is not surprising that my views on the subject have been ignored for some 40 years.

Advertisement

That does not mean I am right. What it does mean, however, is that we should look at the record carefully and determine whether we have led ourselves up the garden path in our policies to "fight inflation". I say this, too, in the light of our casual dealing with the whole concept of inflation. There is a chronic failure to draw a sufficient distinction between consumer-price and asset-price inflation.

A hike in interest rates will almost certainly have an impact on asset-price inflation probably, to all intents and purposes, the same as the "damp-down" effect an interest-rate hike will have on fixed-capital investment.

However, once again, we must be careful.

If central bankers, in their wisdom, hike rates slowly and marginally, the acquisition of assets - by speculators, for example - may be encouraged rather than otherwise, at least for a time. The tipping point, when it comes, may be difficult to identify.

I do not want to be dogmatic on the point, but Greenspan’s interest-rate shenanigans may have had this effect on speculators and others especially during the latter years of his reign.

We must also distinguish carefully between interest rates and credit. In certain situations, the crucial consideration may - critically - be credit availability rather than the level of interest rates.

Advertisement

In recent years in particular, the free flow of virtually all kinds of capital globally has meant great volatility in flows and substantial increases in the carry trade. A revival of the carry trade seems under way right now with the US dollar participating significantly in the outward flow of funds.

Whether the latter is so or not, the unregulated flow of funds is a high-risk situation that we dare not ignore if we are to achieve stability and real growth in a more stable future global financial system.

So we must look at the flow of funds and the general availability of credit rather than focus our attention entirely - as we have tended in the past to do - on moving interest rates up or down. In the past, our central bankers have tended to engage in a simplistic yo-yo exercise. This will not give us the dynamic stability we want in the future.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

James Cumes is a former Australian ambassador and author of America's Suicidal Statecraft: The Self-Destruction of a Superpower (2006).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by James Cumes

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of James Cumes
Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy