Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Democratising the corporate world

By Ken McKay - posted Tuesday, 22 September 2009


We need to reform corporate laws so that when a civil prosecution is successful on particular grounds such as price fixing, misleading conduct, or trading while insolvent, that the corporate veil is lifted automatically for board members of corporations.

The current penalties are simply insufficient to deter unethical or illegal behaviour; exposing individual board members to the possibility of complete financial ruin is more likely to ensure ethical behaviour. It is more likely to ensure greater vigilance by board members to ensure the corporations they are responsible for act not only within the technical aspects of the law but the spirit of the law.

We will hear the Melbourne Club and the Business Council of Australia claim that such reforms would deter talented people from accepting positions on boards. This argument is a furphy. If the individuals act with ethics and diligence they will have nothing to fear.

Advertisement

Structurally we need to ensure that the systems of governance promote the long term interests of the corporation. Allowing executive remuneration to be influenced by short term economic outcomes is not healthy. If it is good enough for workers to be subjected to secret ballots before they can withdraw their labour, it is good enough that executive remuneration greater than 15 times the average wage for the corporation be subject to a binding secret ballot of shareholders. A proper secret ballot that does not allow the Tammany Hall ballot stuffing if the result is not going the way of the board is necessary.

All public corporations should have at least two board members elected by the non-executive workforce. Worker participation within corporate Australia is generations behind European and Japanese corporations. We urgently need to bring industrial democracy to corporate Australia.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

38 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ken McKay is a former Queensland Ministerial Policy Adviser now working in the Queensland Union movement. The views expressed in this article are his views and do not represent the views of past or current employers.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ken McKay

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ken McKay
Article Tools
Comment 38 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy