Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Our mob's future isn't in our hands

By Stephen Hagan - posted Tuesday, 1 September 2009


The Australian government risked the lives of our brave soldiers despite knowing that the incumbent President, Hamid Karzai, had formed alliances with known warlords who, it is alleged, have committed horrific crimes against their own people; and despite the fact the Afghanistan population have become disillusioned with him after years of oppression against women, corruption, slow-moving economy, extreme poverty and escalating violence.

Oppression against women, corruption, slow-moving economy, extreme poverty and escalating violence - sounds familiar.

Yep - and the Northern Territory Intervention will remedy that problem back home!

Advertisement

But still the Australian government fully supported the right for Afghanistan people to vote for those they thought would best represent their future aspirations.

So why would the government and selected Indigenous leaders endorse a concept that doesn’t allow Indigenous Australians the right to cast a vote for the leaders they believe could best represent our future aspirations? And why insist on equal representation of women as a prerequisite for endorsement of this new model.

Do they really believe Indigenous women are incapable of acting responsibly and independently when voting in a secret ballot?

I believe our women have the right to be whatever percentage of a new representative body - as voted for by their people - be that 50, 60 or 70 per cent. Why limit them to just 50 per cent? Why is it necessary to have such draconian conditions for Indigenous Australians?

I would however support an elected Indigenous model based on the following:

  • committees comprising three esteemed Indigenous leaders from each State and Territory, including the Torres Strait Island (nine in total), to produce a shortlist of 10 nominated delegates to stand for election from an open tender process;
  • the Australian Electoral Commission to conduct elections for Indigenous people to choose their representative in each State, Territory and the TSI from the pool of 10 endorsed candidates;
  • the nine elected representatives to become full time members and they alone vote on their executive;
  • the new body would be elected every three years, to perform an advisory role to government only;
  • the government would provide recurrent funding, including the establishment costs for a secretariat, as well as wages and on-going costs for delegate’s support staff.
Advertisement

Meanwhile, Calma’s proposed unelected model is fraught with danger and simply won’t work in its current form.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

17 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Stephen Hagan is Editor of the National Indigenous Times, award winning author, film maker and 2006 NAIDOC Person of the Year.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Stephen Hagan

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Stephen Hagan
Article Tools
Comment 17 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy