Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Veiled threat: separating mosque from mass transit

By Jonathan J. Ariel - posted Thursday, 6 August 2009


While the MAC rejected the appeal, this did not stop Muslims turning down an average of three fares a day. Each refusal based on their religious objection to alcohol, according to MSP Airport spokesman, Mr Patrick Hogan.

"Travellers often feel surprised and insulted [when they are refused]," Mr Hogan added.

With this in mind, the MAC proposed a pragmatic solution: drivers refusing to carry alcohol could get a special colour light on their car roofs, broadcasting to one and all their commitment to the Holy Koran. From the airport's point of view, this scheme offered a sensible and efficient mechanism to resolve what it considered to be a minor irritant, leaving both passengers and drivers happy. As Mr Hogan explained: "Airport authorities are not in the business of interpreting sacred texts or dictating anyone's religious choices." The two-light proposal was to be in operation by the end of the holiest month in the Islamic calendar in 2006, Ramadan.

Advertisement

But the proposed solution had massive implications. The two-light plan in effect imposed Sharia, or Islamic law, with state sanction on a mundane commercial transaction. A government authority was thus tasked with publically identifying which taxi driver followed in the footsteps of the Prophet Mohammed and which driver did not.

As luck would have it, the MAC proposed solution never saw light of day. Taxi owners, savvy as they are, feared that customers would boycott Muslim taxis, identifiable by their lights. They also feared that customers would soon boycott taxis altogether and use other means of transportation.

Just before the end of Ramadan of 2008 nine cabbies, a mix of owner-drivers and non-owner drivers, went to the Minnesota Court of Appeals and departed very unhappy, when reminded that Muslim cabbies risk losing their taxi licenses if they give passengers the middle finger.

The men said their religious beliefs prohibited them from carrying alcohol. But the Appeals Court was unmoved, upholding the lower court's decision. Both courts said that the respondents failed to show that they would suffer irreparable harm if they were not granted the right to refuse.

And so we come back to the incident in Greystanes.

An unwarranted allowance was sought in order to accommodate another culture. An allowance that serves only to magnify the folly that is known as “multiculturalism”. This ideology is a demonstrated failure in the United States, the United Kingdom and the European Union and is shameless minority vote buying. With devastating consequences for social cohesion. Devastating.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

68 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jonathan J. Ariel is an economist and financial analyst. He holds a MBA from the Australian Graduate School of Management. He can be contacted at jonathan@chinamail.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jonathan J. Ariel

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Jonathan J. Ariel
Article Tools
Comment 68 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy