Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Death of author unlikely

By Tim Wilson - posted Monday, 20 July 2009


The other claim from industry interests and authors is that removing import restrictions will undermine territorial copyright.

But even if import restrictions are in the Copyright Act, they are not necessary to protect copyright.

In every book there are two property rights. The first is the physical book: the cover, pages, binding and ink. The second is the copyright, which is the order of the text on the pages. So long as a book is printed in a country that is a party to international copyright treaties, import restrictions don't do anything for copyright; they only protect the publishing and printing industries and unnecessarily hike the price of books.

Advertisement

But the real problem for the industry is that by opposing book imports it is sticking its head in the sand. We all know the direction of retail book sales isn't just through the local bookstore. The real growth of sales is through the internet. Pending foreign exchange fluctuations, books are regularly cheaper to buy on Amazon and import into Australia, even with postage costs.

The recommendations from the Productivity Commission review should have been a wake-up call to industry that government-sponsored protection in a global economy won't last forever. Instead of trying to perpetuate protection, the industry should be using the remaining three years of protection to make structural adjustments and become globally competitive. And the best way to do that is to find ways to reduce costs and pass on the benefits to consumers.

The book industry may fear the removal of import restrictions, but consumers won't want imported books if those produced in Australia are the same price or cheaper anyway.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Australian on July 16, 2009.

Advertisement
 Institute of Public Affairs Advertisement

 

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Tim Wilson is the federal Liberal member for Goldstein and a former human rights commissioner.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tim Wilson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Tim Wilson
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from Institute of Public Affairs
 No reality holiday from this population challenge
 For budgets only smaller is tougher
 Government subsidies to green groups must end
 Boot-strapping on a carbon tax
 West's history not complete without reference to Christianity
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy