Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Child abuse is a pervasive problem

By Cathy Kezelman - posted Wednesday, 15 July 2009

The Productivity Commission's report Overcoming Indigenous Disadvantage released on July 2 and commented on by Minister Macklin reveals the parlous rates of child abuse and neglect of Indigenous children. The figures indicate a significant increase on prior figures, and while they may in some part reflect an increase in reporting, they, without a doubt, highlight the devastating scale of a problem which remains largely unaddressed despite the concerted but often paternalistic interventions of successive governments.

The report also demonstrates that the rate of child abuse and neglect for non-Indigenous children has risen as well. It remains challenging to accurately analyse these trends because Australia does not have reliable child abuse and neglect statistics; definitions as to what constitutes the various forms of abuse vary between our states and territories.

A report released last year by Access Economics suggests that the true rate of abuse and neglect in Australian communities may be up to five times that of official figures. There are other difficulties in assessing the true prevalence of the problem - child abuse and child sexual assault remain secret crimes, with multiple bars to disclosure and the pervasive attitudes of denial within our society contribute to the silencing of both child and adult victims.


Either way the relentless parade of new and intractable cases shows that the combined force of current initiatives is not stemming the tide of abuse, child sexual assault or neglect in any communities across Australia. The Forgotten Australians and Lost Innocents Report as well as the report by the Anglican Church into sexual abuse within the Church both released last month have taken positive and proactive steps to address institutional abuse both historically and going forward.

These are crucial initiatives but we also need to shift our focus to the domestic domain, where far too many Australian children are being criticised, humiliated, beaten, molested and raped on a daily basis by those responsible for their care.

Statistics consistently show that the vast majority of cases of child abuse and neglect are perpetrated by a child's natural parents. One report documented that 96 per cent of abusers have a relationship with the child with 72 per cent being the natural parents. Last month ASCA, the key national organisation for advancing the needs of adult survivors of child abuse, lodged a submission to the Human Rights Commission Consultation in support of the first human rights charter.

ASCA's submission, co-authored by Dr Jennifer Wilson from the Centre for Peace and Social Justice and myself as ASCA chairperson, urges child abuse and child sexual assault in the private domestic domain, perpetrated by primary caregivers, for example parents, step parents and legal guardians, to be acknowledged as human rights violations and to be introduced into Australia's first charter of rights as such. Previously the human rights discourse has only concerned itself with the public domain and transgressions between the state and its agents, and the individual.

ASCA's submission is based on Article 19 on the Convention of the Rights of the Child, which clearly establishes a relationship between children and their primary caregivers. When parents fail to keep their young safe the state must intervene. Sadly the incidence of new child abuse and child sexual assault cases shows that despite the best efforts of police and child protection agencies, the human rights violations of child abuse and child sexual assault in domestic settings by primary caregivers continue unabated.

This Federal government has commissioned and is implementing some important initiatives including the Framework for the Protection of Australia's Children and the Time for Action report developed by the National Council to Reduce Violence against Women and Children. The Framework for Protecting Australia's Children states that "All children have the right to be safe and receive loving care and support ... However parents have the primary responsibility for raising their children and ensuring that their rights are upheld."


ASCA contends that a human rights approach must be taken if we are to see a real reduction in the incidence of child abuse, child sexual assault and neglect across the board. To achieve this the domestic domain can no longer remain private and untouchable. We would all prefer to believe that all Australian children are receiving the loving care and attention they deserve and need from those charged with their care. Sadly for the 55,000 children substantiated to have been abused in 2008 and the up to five times children who were abused but failed to come to the attention of child protection authorities this is no more than a fantasy and we must act. As quoted in the background paper to Time for Action:

The growing international consensus on human rights stresses the right of women and their children to live free from violence.

Domestic and family violence can no longer be hidden as a private matter within families, nor sexual assault hidden as a personal shame beyond the reach of governments or the sanction of our communities. Violence against women and children violates the universal human rights instruments to which the international community has agreed through the United Nations.

ASCA asserts that it is impossible to separate the abuse of the child from the whole of life consequences of the adult survivor and that human rights abuses, begun in childhood, almost invariably continue into the survivor's adult experiences. Our current laws let survivors down and are not relevant or sufficiently comprehensive. The long-term repercussions suffered by the more than two million adult Australians surviving child abuse are well documented, and the mental health impacts, human rights abuses particular to women and the homeless, contribute further to the marginalisation of this already victimised group.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

45 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Cathy Kezelman is the chair of Adults Surviving Child Abuse (ASCA).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Cathy Kezelman

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 45 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy