Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

North Korea: another day, another dice with Armageddon

By Graham Cooke - posted Monday, 6 July 2009


Another day, another dice with Armageddon. For analysts and others watching the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea these are compelling times as one major threat after another spews out of Pyongyang.

Last week it would be “an act of war” if any North Korean vessel was stopped on the high seas as a result of the United Nations-mandated sanctions regime; then came “reliable intelligence” reported in the Japanese media that the North Koreans were planning a missile test, to be fired off in the direction of Hawaii on July 4, prompting United States Defence Secretary Robert Gates to say that he had ordered the deployment of “defensive measures” around the islands.

If that wasn’t enough a report carried by North Korea’s official Central News Agency recently (June 27) accused the “warmongers of the Japanese aggression forces” of sending spy planes over North Korean territory. The agency stated that any further incursions would be “mercilessly shot down”.

Advertisement

Coming from almost any other country on earth, comments and actions such as these would be incendiary, and would have delegates scurrying to the United Nations to find some way of heading off what would almost certainly be an act of major aggression, but with North Korea nothing is at it seems.

Even so the Pyongyang leadership is keeping North Asia at a high level of tension - which is almost certainly the limit of its intentions - in the hope that it will drag more concessions out of the currently stalled Six Party Talks on its nuclear weapons program.

Just how much of all this is rhetoric and should the West be at all concerned the DPRK’s attitude of super belligerence? The country definitely has nuclear weapons - how many is not clear - and it is developing the means to deliver them, even if this is under the flimsy guise of a space program, so this is not something that can be ignored. However, North Asia analyst and researcher Jeffrey Robertson believes that while the Western media loves a good crisis, there is little to fear from North Korea while “Dear Leader” Kim Jong-il remains at the helm.

In a recent address to the ACT branch of the Australian Institute of International Affairs, Robertson discounted much of the reporting on North Korea as speculations, interspersed with a few “facts” from dubious sources. He cited the recent example of a statement by the Vice Chairman of the UN Joint Chiefs of Staff, Lieutenant General Patrick Cartwright that North Korea would have the capability of sending ballistic missiles to the American West Coast in three to five years.

“What wasn’t reported was that very similar predictions have been made in the past which have failed to materialise,” he said.

Robertson does not discount the danger from North Korea, but puts the ultimate flashpoint further down the track, specifically when Kim Jong-il leaves the scene.

Advertisement

That, he says, will represent a very real danger because while Kim is 67 and clearly ailing, the leadership appears to have no specific succession plan in place.

This is in stark contrast to the situation in 1994 when Kim’s father, Kim il-sung died. For years beforehand the two had been seen together at formal events - the opening of factories, military parades and so on. There was never any doubt that Kim Jong-il was the designated successor. Robertson says nothing like that has been put in place this time.

Kim Jong-il has three sons: the eldest, Kim Jong-nam has always had a playboy image, and disgraced himself when he was arrested at Tokyo International Airport travelling on a false Dominican Republic passport and using a Chinese name. He was eventually deported to China, an embarrassing incident that led to his father cancelling a visit to the People’s Republic. Needless to say Jong-nam, who reportedly lives in Macau and is a regular figure at the gaming tables, is out of favour.

The second son, Kim Jung-chul is supposed to have significant support within the army, but other reports have discounted him as lacking the stamina, even being “too girlish” to lead the country. That leaves youngest son, Kim Jung-woon as the apparent successor. However, Jung-woon is only in his mid-20s in a society that respects age and seniority. If his father dies within the next few years, the opposition to such an immature successor could be intense.

In fact Robertson believes that a succession to Kim Jung-woon or either of his brothers is the least likely scenario, citing three other possibilities - collective leadership, military rule or disintegration.

Collective leadership might involve a group of senior figures from the Korean Workers Party, military generals and technocrats, possibly also involving members of Kim’s large extended family to give the mix an air of respectability. It would probably be the least threatening development for North Asia and the West generally.

The military is, on the surface at least, disciplined and powerful. However, its key officers are believed to be under constant surveillance by the State’s security services, while Kim Jong-il has been careful to cultivate links within the military establishment. In the end the generals might feel they have less to lose by supporting the status quo.

Robertson says the most harrowing scenario - and the one that is most dangerous to the West - is a descent of the nuclear-armed regime into chaos with the very real possibility of disruption to food supplies, demands for more civil and political rights and the rise of transnational crime.

“A breakdown in authority or continued instability in North Korea could provide ripe conditions for the rise of transnational crime,” he said, pointing out that failings in the rule of law and weak judicial systems allowed crime to flourish in Eastern Europe after the fall of communism.

“Add to that North Korea’s highly militarised society in which a large section of the population has spent time in the military and pretty much you have the ingredients for an organised and effective international crime network,” he said.

While Robertson did not take his argument much further, it is easy to see that enriched uranium would be a highly attractive product for which terrorist organisations such as al-Qaeda would be willing to pay considerable sums.

And the ultimate nightmare would be for the whole nuclear arsenal to fall into the hands of a megalomaniac with the desire to put the world to rights with a few well-chosen missiles.

Could it happen? A lot would depend on the will of major players in North Asia, including the United States, Japan, South Korea and China, to act quickly and effectively, probably without waiting for long-winded UN resolutions. Intervention would almost certainly be necessary, either from the south with American support or the north by China, or perhaps by both.

Either way, a Somalia-type meltdown in North Korea would present the international community with its biggest challenge, certainly since the end of the Cold War and probably since World War II.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Cooke has been a journalist for more than four decades, having lived in England, Northern Ireland, New Zealand and Australia, for a lengthy period covering the diplomatic round for The Canberra Times.


He has travelled to and reported on events in more than 20 countries, including an extended stay in the Middle East. Based in Canberra, where he obtains casual employment as a speech writer in the Australian Public Service, he continues to find occasional assignments overseas, supporting the coverage of international news organisations.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Cooke

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Cooke
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy