Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Up close and spineless: Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs

By Jake Lynch - posted Thursday, 18 June 2009

There’s a fascinating exhibition at the Australian museum in Sydney. Titled “Up Close and Spineless”, it features winning entries in a photography competition focusing on the colourful world of invertebrates.

These, along with the permanent insect exhibits, struck me as an apt metaphor for Australia’s “Foreign Affairs community”: a swarm of politicians, public servants, think-tankers and academics. Research on recent international events, and the reactions of world governments, confirmed the impression that Australia is home to the most spineless foreign ministry anywhere on earth, along with 12 per cent of the known species of cockroach.

Two episodes in particular have outraged global opinion - Israel’s attack on Gaza in January, and, last month, the massacre by the Sri Lankan army of 20,000 Tamils. Each government accused a non-state armed group of using civilians as human shields - then went ahead and attacked them anyway. This is explicitly ruled out by a norm of humanitarian protection accepted by the vast majority of the international community. The 1977 Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions specify that:


The presence within the civilian population of individuals who do not come within the definition of civilians does not deprive the population of its civilian character. (Article 50)

The list of signatories includes 160 of the 200-odd UN member states, Australia being one. Among the absentees are Israel, Sri Lanka and the United States.

Among the “big beasts” of the international community, responses to this year’s events show abundant double standards. America provided diplomatic cover for Israel as usual, including a last-minute abstention at the Security Council, which scuppered a ceasefire resolution. Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State in the new Administration, later called on the IMF to suspend development aid to Colombo. India, vocal in its condemnation over Gaza, kept shut about Sri Lanka to the point where one of its retired generals publicly accused it of complicity.

Timid bottom-feeders, meanwhile - countries that would not necessarily develop an opinion, like, say, Bulgaria, Botswana and Bolivia - were “covered” in strong statements put out on their behalf by the European Union, African Union or Organization of American States. Even ASEAN, through the Heads Statement of its 14th Summit, identified Israel’s attack as the cause of a humanitarian crisis, and called for an immediate ceasefire.

The only such club that Australia belongs to - the Commonwealth - has a Ministerial Action Group, which is supposed to uphold standards of human rights agreed in the Harare Declaration of 1991. Except it spent the early months of 2009 belying its name by steadfastly refusing to meet.

New Zealand piped up with a call at the UN General Assembly for Israel to “end its military offensive” and “condemning” its “appalling attacks on United Nations personnel and facilities”. Deputy Permanent Representative Kirsty Graham mentioned “allegations of serious violations of international humanitarian law” and affirmed New Zealand’s support for “the UN Secretary General’s call for an impartial inquiry”. The statement features in the list of media releases on the NZ foreign ministry’s website.


And what do we find, in the “media room” of its Canberra counterpart? Nothing. Zilch. Nix. Yes, Australia is the only democratic country on earth not to have uttered so much as a peep of condemnation of either of these two violations of international humanitarian law. Each merits two press statements, drawing attention to Australian aid. Important, of course, but to confine oneself to that is to connive in the project the late Israeli political scientist, Baruch Kimmerling, called “politicide”: a plot to get the world to see the Palestinian cause not as a political struggle but in purely humanitarian terms, instead.

Following the fall of the LTTE (Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam), Foreign Minister Stephen Smith did call for access by international humanitarian organisations to the displacement camps where thousands were now held by the Sri Lankan government, but he conspicuously failed to back the call, by UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay, for an independent investigation into alleged war crimes. The recent report by a Colombo-based human rights group, highlighting important signs that both sides were guilty of atrocities in the closing days of the military exchanges, emphasises the need for an authoritative version of events to be independently reached.

“Now that the conflict is over”, Smith told Sky News on May 19, “people will be in a better position in time to make judgments about the conduct of the military engagement”. Well, they are: as UN Human Rights Council president Martin Ihoeghian Uhomoibhi put it, “the international community must strive to deliver justice to victims of human rights violations wherever they occur and ensure that those found guilty of such crimes are held accountable for their actions”.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

First published by Transcend Media Services in the week June 8-14, 2009.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Associate Professor Jake Lynch divides his time between Australia, where he teaches at the Department of Peace and Conflict Studies of Sydney University, and Oxford, where he writes historical mystery thrillers. His debut novel, Blood on the Stone, is published by Unbound Books. He has spent the past 20 years developing, researching, teaching and training in Peace Journalism: work for which he was honoured with the 2017 Luxembourg Peace Prize, awarded by the Schengen Peace Foundation.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jake Lynch

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Jake Lynch
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy