Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Unravelling good debt

By Henry Thornton - posted Tuesday, 2 June 2009


And, “the sleeper is the blame and criticism that will be levelled at the ‘superannuation’ system - including the Government, for enforcing contributions to super and fund managers”.

Another issue likely to get far more airplay in the year ahead is the shocking growth of Australia's international debt. The last number Henry saw for Australia's international debt was not far shy of $700 billion, and rising. Much of this is owed by Australia's banks.

Treasury (supported by some of the economists of the Australian National University), has traditionally regarded international debt as good debt, financing Australia's development.

Advertisement

Sadly, however, that view is largely wrong.

Tony Makin today issues a qualified mea culpa on behalf of his former Canberra-based colleagues. (The final paragraphs of this biographical account reports the 1980s debate and policy action.)

Most of Australia's international debt has financed not productive investment, but rather a massive housing boom and consumption that is well in excess of Australia's capacity to supply. The Canberra view, that this was good debt, was severely shaken when the Lehman Brothers collapse caused interbank lending to dry up virtually overnight. The debt of the Australian banks would not have been refinanced except for the prompt loan of Australia's triple-A credit rating to these banks.

While it is an over-simplification, there is a sense in which one should add the Government's domestic debt to the total overseas debt to get an estimate of Australia's over-spending and the constraints on policy action - the “no ammo” issue.

It was the over-spending in the 1920s that made the 1930s so severe for Australia, as it was for other debtor nations.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Australian and in Henry Thornton's blog on June 1, 2009.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Henry Thornton (1760-1815) was a banker, M.P., Philanthropist, and a leading figure in the influential group of Evangelicals that was known as the Clapham set. His column is provided by the writers at www.henrythornton.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Henry Thornton

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Henry Thornton
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy