Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Good reasons for not wanting to be sustainable

By Eric Claus - posted Tuesday, 9 June 2009


Get money and use it wisely

One of the earliest lessons that most of us learn, is that dad (and often mum) have to go to work and the reason they have to go to work, is to get money. Most of our lives revolve around going to work and getting money. Once we’ve got the money, we learn that we better not waste it. We need to know the price of the things that we are going to buy, because mum and dad had to work hard for that money.

So what’s that got to do with sustainability? First, since we focus so much on things that cost money, we tend to ignore things that are free or very low cost, even if they are tremendously valuable. Things like clean air and clean water, the ozone layer, and a comfortable climate are very valuable to us, but since we don’t have to do any work to get them, we don’t give them any value. Why be sustainable if it means going to a lot of trouble to protect the things that are already free?

Advertisement

Second, the prices that drive our free market society, and make it so efficient in allocating goods and services are the result of the interaction between supply and demand. The demand, though, is set in today’s market place where the only bidders are people who have money today. Future generations can’t bid in the free market, so they don’t increase the demand and the price stays low. If the price were higher we might conserve resources, but the price is low, so we don’t conserve. We use everything now and we know we are right, because we learned a long time ago that the price is the only guide we need.

Third, prices are so convenient. We know exactly how much a litre of petrol costs and how much a cheeseburger costs, so we can plan our lives accordingly. We don’t know how much clean air and clean water for the next generation costs, so how can we make our decisions? This sustainability stuff just can’t be trusted.

Bigger is better

As kids we learned that big people (adults) are in charge. Big kids ruled the playground. Somebody who has a big house and a big car is successful. In all things, bigger is better.

Population growth advocates argue that Australia would be a better country with a higher population. We know per capita income drops slightly with a higher population and the environment is worse off, but that doesn’t matter as much as being a bigger country, because bigger is better.

Countries with big populations, are the important countries. It doesn’t matter that people are rich and happy in Luxembourg, it is a small country, so it’s a loser country. It doesn’t matter that millions of people in India and China live in horrible poverty with few rights. India and China are big, important countries. Proponents of sustainability say that increasing the population makes it harder to be sustainable, so they are dooming us to be a loser country. That means proponents of sustainability are losers.

Advertisement

Get money plus bigger is better

The more we consume the happier we are. The more stuff and the bigger the stuff we have, the happier we are. Advocates of sustainability want us to recycle and conserve energy and lots of other stuff that isn’t as much fun as spending money on big new stuff. That means they don’t want us to be happy, so sustainability must be a bad idea.

Lessons not learned as a child

Long term thinking

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Eric Claus has worked in civil and environmental engineering for over 20 years.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Eric Claus

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Eric Claus
Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy