Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Mr Pratt's fall from grace

By Katy Barnett - posted Friday, 1 May 2009


It certainly suggests that public opinion is on the side of the late Mr Pratt. Was the Prime Minister tacitly disapproving Mr Samuel's actions by his visit?

Meanwhile, at Larvatus Prodeo, Kim draws parallels between the treatment of Mr Pratt and Marcus Einfeld QC, another respected figure who recently fell from grace. Personally I think there are important distinctions between the two cases. Mr Pratt was never convicted of a crime, although he did concede that he and his company were liable for a civil penalty (an entirely different thing). By contrast, Mr Einfeld pleaded guilty to a crime, and unlike Mr Pratt, he had actually sat in judgment on a person who committed perjury and spoken of the heinous nature of that crime. Nonetheless, I think both cases are tragic. Both are men who have done good things in their lives, but have tarnished their reputations at the end of their lives by their deeds. The difficulty in both cases is weighing up how far a contravention of law should be able to overshadow a person’s many good deeds.

Although Mr Pratt has died, and the criminal charges have been withdrawn, this saga is certainly not closed. The class action against Amcor and Visy continues. No doubt the actions of Mr Pratt, Mr Samuel and the ACCC will continue to be scrutinised.

Advertisement

Watch this space ...

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

26 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Katy Barnett is a lawyer, blogger and lecturer at the University of Melbourne. She lives in Melbourne, Australia and blogs at Skepticlawyer.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Katy Barnett

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 26 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy