Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Politics and truth

By Chris Lewis - posted Wednesday, 8 April 2009


I also thought of my own contradictions. While I was interested in battlers and income disparity, I recognised my own immense ego and quest for a job that paid more money.

And I could not forget the academics that spoke of the need for better public schools but sent their children to private schools, or those who drove old cars with smoke spilling out while they declared their love for the environment in lectures.

By the end of my undergraduate degree, I had changed. Though I still noted the need for an effective manufacturing sector, I also recognised that freer trade was the only fair policy paradigm for encouraging peace and prosperity between competing nations struggling for resources and the influence of certain ideas.

Advertisement

While I had excelled at university, partly because I wrote essays that generally agreed with the views of most academics and tutors, I was increasingly determined to remain committed to the truth, no matter how subjective such an assertion can appear to be or whether it offended the views of fellow students or academics.

But I have tried hard to remain faithful to my prime interest in income disparity both within and between nations, and even environmental degradation, although I admit I am no closer to observing revolutionary solutions.

Today, all I can do is defend the liberal cause and the recent efforts of Western governments to appease both national and international considerations, albeit while I recognise the current economic turmoil and the reality that just a small number of nations still dominate the world economy even if China and India are to be included.

My interpretation of the facts will not even allow me to ridicule the efforts of Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, John Howard and George W. Bush, although I have argued that the decision of Australia to support the US in Iraq without a UN mandate was one of the worst policy decisions by liberal democracies (Quadrant).

Sure, I observed the dodgy support given by the US and other nations to corrupt regimes, but I recognised that powerful nations do make tough decisions and often get it wrong.

And I never believed that any Western political leader simply adhered to the theories of Friedman or Hayek and set about to introduce ruthless policies, nor that such liberal economists would ever claim to have the answers to such a complex world. Liberal-minded politicians and economists were doing their best to offer policies and ideas that they believed met the demands of the day.

Advertisement

Rather, I observed the increasing difficulty for Western governments with their post war efforts to both accept the ideal of freer trade yet uphold their national interest to maintain a high standard of living.

In Australia, the struggle was evident under the Hawke and Keating governments to be financially responsible, maintain a manufacturing sector, and improve Australia’s social welfare services.

No longer could Australia rely on high tariffs and high wages while allowing its domestic industry to be uncompetitive against foreign competition. Its close military relationship with the US was now complicated by the rise of China and its increasing economic importance. There was greater concern about welfare dependency compared to the 1960s when just 3 per cent of the Australian population were dependent on such assistance. Australia’s recent embracement of its multicultural nature was challenged by the rise of Islamic extremism, and the environment has become an issue of greater concern, thus requiring greater public resources.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

12 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Chris Lewis, who completed a First Class Honours degree and PhD (Commonwealth scholarship) at Monash University, has an interest in all economic, social and environmental issues, but believes that the struggle for the ‘right’ policy mix remains an elusive goal in such a complex and competitive world.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Chris Lewis

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 12 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy