Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Wind energy blowing hot air

By Mark S. Lawson - posted Friday, 20 March 2009


There are ways of storing energy which may also help with this problem. One small-scale method involves charging battery electrolyte (the fluid in large batteries) and storing the electrolyte for use later in re-energising batteries. Its use with a turbine system on King Island in Bass Strait has reduced, although not eliminated, local use of diesel powered generators. (See here.)

Another possibility is to use wind turbines to pump water into a dam so that the dam can then be used to produce hydro-electricity as and when required. The dam is a form of battery. Energy from coal powered plants is used to pump water uphill when the energy is not required for the grid. But this does not seem to be done anywhere with wind energy.

This very substantial problem with wind energy then may be overcome with considerably more work, and some careful planning. Instead of looking for windy sites, network planners should look for an optimal spread of sites to smooth out some of those enormous variations, and combine it with improved wind forecasting. Perhaps hooking those sites up to a spread of wave power generators and combine it all with a dam might achieve something - although the designers will also have to take into account the cost of building transmission lines out to more remote areas where there might be more wind.

Advertisement

But nothing like that is being planned and, if it were, generating a genuine 20 per cent from renewables, as opposed to a symbolic reduction, would seem to be an all but impossible figure. A 5 per cent genuine contribution would seem to be more achievable.

As matters now stand, if power generating companies are required to buy 20 per cent of their power from renewable generators by 2020, then they will do so, and pass the cost onto the consumers. The problem is that it will be a nominal 20 per cent - the power stations will still be operating at almost the same capacity, as they would be if the renewables were not there at all, and the network would be overall less efficient. The wind farms and other projects will be there simply to make voters think that the Government has done something about emissions. They will be an expensive symbol, and a symbol for which consumers will pay.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

22 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark Lawson is a senior journalist at the Australian Financial Review. He has written The Zen of Being Grumpy (Connor Court).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark S. Lawson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Mark S. Lawson
Article Tools
Comment 22 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy