Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Do voters care if politicians lie?

By Peter Tucker - posted Monday, 20 October 2008


… citizens are prepared to trust those governments whose leading representatives have demonstrated their reliability and so have won their confidence - which literally means “faith”, particularly faith in the reliability of representatives to do what the community requires. (Uhr 2007)

The conclusion is that the "conviction politician" is a politician whom the public respects (Kelly 2003(b); Shanahan 2002). But attempting to ascertain why some politicians are perceived so, and why others are not, is difficult to establish with certainty. For example, John Howard was consistently described in the terms of a conviction politician but so were state Labor leaders Peter Beattie, Steve Bracks and Bob Carr. Beattie and Bracks were completely different in personality and leadership style from Howard; and Carr a different personality again, so it is difficult to conclude that conviction politics can be identified in terms of behavioural traits.

Conviction, for all its reported benefits and attributes, nevertheless remains a nebulous concept, difficult to describe and difficult to ascribe. Some don’t believe in it at all, just an “empty accolade showered by excitable commentators” according to Peter Brent.

Advertisement

But I’m not so sure. My suspicion is that voters prefer ends over means when it comes to politics. They will not go on voting for a corrupt or incompetent government but are not too fussed about “the truth” providing the job gets done. They expect their politicians to lie and are much less surprised than the commentators when it inevitably happens.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Peter Tucker has worked in Tasmania as an advisor for the Liberals in opposition and in ministerial offices for both Labor and Liberal governments. He is author of the Tasmanian Politics website, and is a researcher at the University of Tasmania’s School of Government.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter Tucker

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Peter Tucker
Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy