Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Put your thinking hat on

By Chris Golis - posted Tuesday, 30 September 2008


Early in the 1980s Dr de Bono invented the Six Thinking Hats method which was subsequently described in his book Six Thinking Hats (1985). The method is best described as a framework for thinking.

In most organisations, corporate culture will cause most managers to adopt a specific perspective (retailers will be optimistic; insurance companies will be pessimistic; engineers will be objective; and so on). This in turns limits how management will deal with problems. The benefit of Six Thinking Hats is that one can see problems from different perspectives.

The hats are meant to be categories of thinking behavior and not of people themselves. The purpose of the hats is to direct thinking, not to classify either the thinking or the thinker. Indeed, by wearing a hat that is different from the one that one customarily wears, managers may chance upon a variety of new ideas. Wearing a hat means deliberately adopting a perspective that is not necessarily one’s own. You can use the Six Thinking Hats technique in meetings or on your own. In meetings it has the benefit of reducing the confrontations that happen when people with different thinking styles discuss the same problem.

Advertisement

Each “Thinking Hat” is a different style of thinking.

De Bono believed that the key to a successful use of the Six Thinking Hats methodology was the deliberate focusing of the discussion on a particular approach as needed during the meeting or collaboration session.

For instance, a meeting may be called to review a particular problem and to develop a solution for the problem. The Six Thinking Hats method could then be used in a sequence to first of all explore the problem, and then develop a set of solutions, and finally agree on an approach. Here is an example agenda for a typical six hats workshop:

  • Step 1: Present the facts of the case.
  • Step 2: Generate ideas on how the case could be handled (green hat).
  • Step 3: Evaluate the merits of the ideas:
    List the benefits (yellow hat);
    List the drawbacks (black hat).
  • Step 4: Get everybody’s gut feelings about the alternatives (red hat).
  • Step 5: Summarise and adjourn the meeting (blue hat).

Because everyone is focused on a particular approach at any one time, the group tends to be more collaborative than if one person is reacting emotionally (red hat) while another person is trying to be objective (white hat) and still another person is being critical of the points which emerge from the discussion (black hat).

Advertisement

De Bono’s hats are indicative of both emotional states as well as frames of mind (i.e. perspective from which an issue is viewed). He noted: "Emotions are an essential part of our thinking ability and not just something extra that mucks up our thinking." (1985, p27) One thinking style (or hat) is not inherently "better" than another. A full, balanced team recognises the need for all hats in order for the team to consider all aspects of whatever issues they are facing.

We all use different types of thinking, usually without realising it. For example, if we are feeling pessimistic about life that will generally be the dominant thinking we apply. This limits our ability to see all the issues. Temperament is the characteristic, or habitual inclination, or mode of emotional responses that a person generally adopts.

The Humm-Wadsworth model of temperament defines seven different personality characteristic or factors. Each of the factors associates itself with certain colours.

If we then look at the Six Thinking Hats we immediately see areas of overlap.

The Mover and Yellow Hat overlap significantly. Movers are positive and optimistic and enthusiastically adopt new solutions. Yellow is the favourite colour of the mover and reflect their sunny disposition.

There is some overlap between the Politician and the Blue Hat. Politicians like to make decisions and are attracted to positions of power. The Blue Hat is about making decisions.

The Normal and White Hat also overlap substantially. White Hat thinking is exactly what people dominated by the Normal component do.

On the other hand there are some significant differences.

Black Hat thinking matches up with the Doublechecker who almost immediately when presented with a new idea or proposal look at the risks and what can go wrong. Black is not the colour of the Doublechecker. They are risk-adverse and like to keep their feet on Mother Earth. Brown or beige is the colour of the double checker.

Similarly, Green Hat thinking matches up with the Artist. Artists are the people who come up with new ideas and concepts. This is the creative factor and these people beat to a different drum. These are the fashion and interior designers whose clothes can be very idiosyncratic. These people prefer unusual combinations and violet is one of their favourite colours.

By contrast green is the colour of the engineer. Think British racing green, or BRG and you have the Engineer’s colour. Engineers are very interested in building or completing projects and often do have a creative streak. However, they do not have the (particularly visual) imagination of the Artist preferring a more hands-on approach.

It is Red Hat thinking which is the most interesting. De Bono describes red as the emotional colour and includes in the Red Hat chapters varying emotions. It is meant to encompass all the emotions but then in the Yellow and Black Hat chapters goes on to discuss the emotional basis of these two hats.

Red is the Hustler colour. Look at the colour of the ties worn by successful entrepreneurs and business people. However, it is interesting to note that in the first chapter on the Red Hat de Bono talks about intuition, self-interest, and con-men doing it in style. Hence when you put your Red Hat on it should not be a general appeal to emotion but almost a specific appeal to self interest. You will have the comfort of knowing it is the one horse in the race that is always trying.

Conclusion

Using intuition de Bono has rightly defined the colours for yellow, white and blue hat thinking. However:

  • the black hat should be brown;
  • the green hat should be violet; and
  • the red hat should not be a general appeal to emotion but to self-interest.
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Chris Golis is Australia's expert on practical emotional intelligence. He is an author, professional speaker and workshop leader. His site is www.thehummhandbook.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Chris Golis

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Chris Golis
Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy