Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Advantage Australia

By Nicholas Gruen - posted Tuesday, 30 September 2008


The Innovation Review proposes refashioning the concession as a tax credit. This brings it “above the line” for accounting purposes, improving its visibility to company decision makers and protecting the incentive from dilution from any future company tax reductions (which we strongly supported).

For all Australian firms with a turnover of under $50 million, we proposed a 50 per cent refundable tax credit. For each dollar they spend on R&D, firms would get 50 cents from the government. But they’d lose the ability to deduct their R&D spending from their profits. So profitable firms would keep 20 of the cents - up from 7.5 cents today. But at current corporate tax rates of 30 per cent, the other 30 cents in each R&D dollar spent would be returned because - being unable to deduct their R&D - their profits would be one dollar higher.

But here’s the thing. Because the tax credit is refundable, instead of having to wait for their money, tax loss firms would be given extra money until they become profitable. The 50 cents goes straight to their bottom line. As with profitable firms, 20 cents is theirs to keep. But the loss of deductability only hurts them after they become profitable. So they keep the additional 30 cents until then. In place of the firm giving the government an interest free loan until it becomes profitable, under our proposal, it gets one.

Advertisement

This neat policy detail tips the playing field back towards the most innovative firms.

Next stop, a grasscourt on Rod Laver Arena.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in the Australian Financial Review on September 23, 2008.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Nicholas Gruen is CEO of Lateral Economics and Chairman of Peach Refund Mortgage Broker. He is working on a book entitled Reimagining Economic Reform.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Nicholas Gruen

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Nicholas Gruen
Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy