Russell Schneider, previous head of the Australian Health Insurance Association predicts the demise of Medicare unless a fundamental transition from funding to purchasing health care is accomplished (ACHR research paper Nov. 2006). It would enable competition between hospitals and other providers on outcome and finally on prices. However, his proposal of managed competition within preferred provider organisations is not compatible with consumer choice.
Australia deserves a market-based, efficient health delivery system with private insurance and arranged along the lines of subsidiary federalism and consumer choices. Universal health insurance and state run hospitals are incompatible with the rapid innovation that is required to meet the challenges of the 21st century.
Over the last century the average global life expectancy has roughly doubled, from 30 to 60 years and human resources have pretty much replaced natural resources as drivers of the economy. This is exactly why health care has become such a big issue in all developed countries.
Advertisement
Innovation, excellence and global competition in the health care industry are becoming part of the fast growing knowledge-based “people’s economy”, which might give Australia the edge over the Asian Tigers. However, this very advantage could be jeopardised by a meltdown of Medicare caused by the overwhelming burden of retiring baby boomers if no action is taken. That’s encapsulated in ANU Professor Ross Garnaut’s prediction on demography being the route to success in the 21st century.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
8 posts so far.