Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

An uncertain victory for China’s workers

By Lyle Morris - posted Friday, 27 June 2008


China’s passage of a law aimed at bringing more rights to its workers has been heralded as a breakthrough for improving labour rights in China. But businesses view the law as the twilight of the age of cheap labour in China, undermining one of the country’s prized economic advantages in globalised economy.

China’s economic boom and low consumer prices in the West were delivered largely on the backs of an overworked and underpaid labour force, which lacks fundamental protections that labourers in developed countries enjoy. The new law signals the Chinese government taking steps to rein in what they see is an unacceptable gap between economic expansion and poor condition of workers.

On January 1, 2008, the Labor Contract Law went into effect, ushering in sweeping changes to Chinese labour policy. The law - brought about after a spate of headline-grabbing incidents of severe worker abuse in China - is to curb worker abuse and promote harmonious and sustainable relationships among employers and employees. Apart from offering tacit admission of mistreatment of the workers, the law is also in line with efforts by President Hu Jintao to cement his legacy as promoter of a “harmonious society”.

Advertisement

Under the law, which affects both domestic and foreign companies operating in China, workers will see increased protection from labour unions and significant overhauls in policy ranging from contract formation to severance packages and job training. Arguably the most influential - and controversial - change centres on an open-term clause for long-term employees. The clause states that workers with 10 consecutive years, or having signed two consecutive fixed-term contracts with a company, are entitled to a contract without a fixed end date - essentially giving them lifetime employment.

Many foreign businesses bemoan what they claim will add unnecessary bureaucratic steps to management practices, making business in China more costly and restrictive.

“It will be more difficult to get rid of unsatisfactory employees,” says Andreas Lauffs, partner at Baker & McKenzie in Hong Kong and expert on Chinese labour law, adding that the law will reduce management autonomy.

Still, experts within China and labour groups abroad call it the most significant labour law since China was first introduced to market forces in the 1980s - and necessary to protect employee rights.

“Before, companies hired and fired employees at will, adding to mistrust among employees and employers,” said Chang Kai, dean of research at the Institute of Labour Relations at Renmin University in Beijing and one of the law’s drafters. “This law will not only urge companies to improve their management practices, but will help bring businesses in line with international labour standards.”

China is hoping the law will help put to rest negative images of sweatshop labourers toiling in inhumane conditions, being fired at will and struggling for years to collect unpaid wages from unscrupulous employers. Chinese law requires labour contracts to be signed between companies and their staff, but contracts are typically for one or two years, and companies are notorious for not providing written contracts and being delinquent in paying workers on time. Workers typically are compelled to take short-term contracts, with little chance of advancement.

Advertisement

During the law’s formulation, a one-month comment period generated huge reaction - almost 200,000 responses - and the process of public inclusion was hailed by many as a seminal achievement in Chinese legislation, reflecting the state's desire to tap a wider base of expertise to ensure laws suited to an increasingly complex economy and society.

Many foreign enterprises voiced discontent with the law. Among them was Serge Janssens de Varebeke, then-president of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, who warned in a 2006 letter to the National People's Congress that the “strict regulations" could raise production costs and "force foreign companies to reconsider new investments or continuing their activities in China".

Concerns over increased operation costs, especially when labour, energy and land costs are all on the rise, portend a markedly more expensive business environment for companies in China. Already, multinationals heavily reliant on cheap labour and low manufacturing costs have begun relocating some of factories to countries like Vietnam, where cheap labour is still abundant. Olympus Corporation, the world's fourth largest digital camera manufacturer, and Yue Yuen Industrial, the biggest maker of shoes for brands such as Nike, are among companies shifting some production facilities to Vietnam to cut costs.

Karen Lin, a senior fund manager at Paradigm Asset Management Co. in Taipei, predicts the law will add roughly 25 per cent to the cost of labour in China, which typically accounts for 10 per cent of total manufacturing costs. Companies that fail to adjust will start to feel major pressure on their profits within “five to six years,” Lin said.

“China’s biggest advantage in the manufacturing and processing trade is cheap labour,” admitted Chang Han-wen, director of the National Association of Taiwan Businessmen in Dongguan, an industrial hub in southern China. “But now that’s going to change. Hundreds of small and medium-sized Taiwan-invested firms in Pearl River Delta region will be affected.”

Chinese officials, meanwhile, contend that added costs to businesses will be minimal. During the recently completed 11th National Committee of the CPPCC, Zhang Mingqi, deputy president of the All-China Federation of Trade Unions, refuted claims that the law will add significant costs to business operations in China. He also warned that penalties could impose more costs than compliance.

The majority of criticism, from foreign and domestic companies alike, centers on the 10-year open-ended contract clause. Dubbed the "fire and hire" game, some employers rushed to terminate existing contracts and rehire staff on new contracts in order to restart their length of service before the January 1, 2008, deadline - an apparent effort to circumvent some of the law's key provisions.

In December 2007, Huawei Technologies Co., a telecommunication-equipment giant based in Shenzhen, reportedly offered a bonus to 7,000 employees with at least eight years of service to resign and reapply for their positions. Other companies followed suit, like French discount retailer Carrefour, which reportedly asked more than 40,000 employees across China to re-sign a two-year labour contract before the deadline, regardless of the length of the employees' service with the company. A Carrefour spokesman maintains that the move was simply to “bring the old contracts under compliance”.

In the long run, whether or not the law is successful in curbing worker abuse is another matter. Critics point out that the while the law will add much needed rights for workers, its goal of reducing worker-abuse cases might be difficult.

“The impact it will have on migrant workers’ working conditions will be limited,” says Lauffs. “Simply passing a new law will not guarantee that the local labour bureaus will become more active in enforcing employees’ rights or companies will be more accommodating in coming into compliance.”

A fundamental question is whether Chinese workers will actually make use of their newfound power. “I think many workers will be hesitant to use their full rights under the law” says Zhangjian, secretary at a small electronics manufacturing company in Beijing. “Bringing too much attention to yourself could cost you your job.”

The law is yet another example of how China walks a treacherous economic and political tightrope. While attempting to maintain their grip on power fueled by prosperity, the country’s leaders must create jobs and abuse-free working conditions. However, investors who create jobs and wealth will continue to hunt for cheap labour, either by finding loopholes or relocating factories to other countries.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Reprinted with permission from YaleGlobal Online - www.yaleglobal.yale.edu - (c) 2008 Yale Center for the Study of Globalization.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Lyle Morris is a reporter and editor for the China Economist magazine in Beijing. The China Economist, an academic journal put out by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, focuses on economic and business management issues in China.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy