Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Should we be cynical?

By Ruby Hamad - posted Friday, 27 June 2008


Palestinians claim that such attacks are common and go unpunished by the Israelis. And while IJ has said it would respect the truce in Gaza, it also stressed that it would not hesitate to retaliate against any attacks upon Palestinians in the West Bank. Since these attacks would most likely come from Gaza, it will blow the truce apart.

And now, for this very reason, just six days into the truce, it is already in jeopardy. On Monday, June 23, the Israeli Defence Force killed two Palestinians in the West Bank. One was identified as an Islamic Jihad militant, the other as a student, though Israel claims that both men were armed. The very next day IJ, true to its warning, fired two rockets on the Israeli town of Sderot. There were no casualties but Israel nonetheless declared this a “grave violation of the ceasefire”. In retaliation Israel has said that it would re-impose economic sanctions against Gaza.

Second, the ongoing saga of Corporal Gilad Shalit continues with no end in sight. For his part, Shalit’s father, Noam Shalit expressed anger and even threatened legal action to halt the implementation of the truce, claiming that it does not guarantee the release of his son. "Olmert told us he does not have a contract that requires him to free any citizen from captivity … that is not acceptable to me, and I don't think it is acceptable to anyone in this country."

Advertisement

While Olmert insists that the release of Shalit is a vital and non-negotiable condition to the success of the truce, Hamas maintains that his release is dependant on the release of Palestinian militants held by Israel.

This seems impossibility as Israel has already expressed extreme reluctance to free these men since many of them were directly involved in the deaths of Israelis. The release of these militants would be viewed by many, not only as a grave mistake and a threat to the lives of many Israelis, but as submission to the demands of Hamas, which is still officially considered a terrorist organisation by Israel.

And on it goes.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ruby Hamad is a freelance writer and recent graduate from the Victorian College of the Arts, where she majored in film writing and directing. She also has a Bachelor's degree in Political Economy from the University of Sydney. Ruby lives in Melbourne where she is working on a new feature film script.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ruby Hamad

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ruby Hamad
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy