Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The case against paid maternity leave

By Leon Bertrand - posted Wednesday, 25 June 2008


Having children is undoubtedly expensive. All parents can testify that time taken off work and money spent on clothes, prams, books, toys and much more, all add up. But why should the rest of society pick up most of the tab? The benefit of having children is primarily enjoyed by the parents concerned, not by outsiders. It is therefore logical that parents, not the state, should be the ones funding such choices.

We need to stop this wasteful churn and encourage an ethic where people who are doing quite well stop looking to the government as a contributor to their incomes.

All this is certainly not to say that paid maternity leave which is voluntarily funded by employers is a bad thing, or should be prohibited. Recently, some very large companies, such as Westpac, News Ltd and Woolworths have decided to provide paid maternity leave to female employees who have been with them for a while.

Advertisement

If employers offer this, it is generally because it is in their commercial interests. For example, paid maternity leave often enables higher rates of staff retention, a big priority for many workplaces given the current competitiveness for employees in the labour market. High retention rates save firms the costs associated with re-advertising, re-hiring and re-training, and also maximise productivity. Such arrangements therefore represent win-win outcomes, and should be encouraged. However, every business and industry is different, so such arrangements should never be made compulsory.

In the meantime, I hope that those who believe in paid maternity leave being forced upon businesses and taxpayers stop and think about the real effects of their policies. If feminism is really about gender equality, it shouldn’t treat women who have children as a special class that is automatically entitled to income from others, regardless of need.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

26 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Leon Bertrand is a Brisbane blogger and lawyer.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Leon Bertrand

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 26 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy