Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

A genuine secular democracy would not be so insecure

By Keysar Trad - posted Friday, 9 May 2008


The article by Dr Bronwyn Winter “Why 'questioning secularism' destroys religious freedom”, published On Line Opinion, May 2, 2008, goes further to drag several names into this including mine, Hanan Dover, Sheik Shady and others, based on allegations and without initially acknowledging my published rebuttal of these allegations. She then makes the claim, without any substantiation, that a certain event at which I spoke was organised by a “fundamentalist” student association. This is simply untrue, it is not factual and is not relevant to the debate.

The issue in question is whether this so called Centre of Excellence is living up to its name. I have no problem in Dr Habib teaching erotica. In my younger days, I wrote a 20-page thesis on love, attraction and emotions that is so complex (or so they tell me) that many readers drop with emotional exhaustion after the first few pages. It was an expression of my thought processes at that time in my life which neither defines me or my faith, even if that experience compelled me to purchase Professor Milad Doueihi’s well presented and researched A perverse history of the human heart which, despite being a very good book, is still waiting for me finish reading.

A genuine secular democracy should not be so insecure: I should be able to present arguments in defence of my faith and also my point of view, even if either of these is unpopular. This secular democracy should be willing to accord me the right to criticise it, particularly if it expects me to allow it to criticise my sanctities. I should be able to present my argument without the emotive accusation that I am somehow undermining or questioning secularism, which in this particular case is another excuse for bullying rather than convincing me into an opinion that differs to mine.

Advertisement

For the record, I am not seeking to dismantle secularism, but attempting to be constructive in approaching its application.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

244 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Keysar Trad is the spokesperson for the Islamic Friendship Association of Australia Inc. which he founded.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Keysar Trad

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 244 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy