Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The squeeze on mortgage provider costs

By Greg Medcraft - posted Wednesday, 30 April 2008


Competition and consumer choice are additional benefits. The Canadian MBS model allows smaller institutions to provide mortgage funding at comparable rates to larger institutions. With the decline of the MBS market in Australia and the flight of deposits to larger institutions, smaller Australian lenders are having trouble accessing funds. Accessing funds at competitive rates is an even greater challenge, which ultimately reduces consumer choice. In contrast, the Canadian MBS market is open to a broad group of lenders that access funding at comparable rates to one another.

Australian borrowers are also expected to benefit from a more transparent market. Under the Canadian model, the rates and spreads of CMBs are the major funding benchmark for all mortgages. This transparency drives competition across the mortgage market.

Moreover, these benefits are available with limited impact on the Federal Government’s budget. The guarantee from the Canadian government is charged on a commercial and zero risk underwriting basis ensuring the public does not subsidise the program. Surplus from the guarantee fee is paid into a guarantee fund held by the CMHC to cover any payments on the guarantee.

Advertisement

Next steps

The ASF believes these enhancements could be a relatively straightforward overlay onto the existing market structure for prime RMBS. Tranching and structuring of cash flows would deal with the longer term of Australian mortgages and swaps would address floating/fixed rate risk.

To develop a more detailed implementation plan, the ASF hopes to establish a taskforce of interested parties in the coming months. The taskforce will further research and advocate the reform opportunity with view to achieving a consensus position on a new model to enhance the Australian MBS market. In the meantime, the ASF is meeting with key industry players to gather feedback and input into the proposed model. We welcome any feedback from On Line Opinion readers.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Greg Medcraft is the Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Securitisation Forum, the peak body representing the securitisation market in Australia.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy