Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Tasmania and the risks to Rudd

By Mike Bolan - posted Wednesday, 2 April 2008


Of course, the state Labor governments have their own agendas and are likely to act to sideline Rudd wherever his ideas are a threat to them. In this case that means pretending that there are no other serious impacts, that a bonanza of benefits is all that we’ll see, that farmers shouldn’t be allowed to live on their own land and that trees are an agricultural crop.

Overall, the big problem for the federal Labor party is that this project exposes them in ways that are pretty much indefensible. The community is clearly coming from the high moral ground when they demand representation, inclusion in planning, pure drinking water and support for food producers. The government only has the support of the forestry industry as its higher purpose. Tough to defend I’d say.

On the media front, the mill proposal threatens the lives of tens of thousands of Tasmanians in their very homes! This is not some remote wilderness, it’s a battle about people’s livelihoods and futures.

Advertisement

It’s The Castle writ large.

There is no regulatory control against offensive mill odours (PDF 239KB) that can hang in the air for weeks. If that happens in the Tamar as independent experts have forecast, people aren’t going to forget the role that Labor played in their misery.

It is, and always has been, a serious mistake to underestimate the problems from continuing to ignore the socio economic impacts of a proposal of this magnitude.

Now, it is the ignoring itself that has become the defining issue.

One thing is for sure, mill proponents aren’t going to want to give up the gravy train easily so whatever happens, it’ll be interesting.

Which is it to be for Australia - Labor run on Rudd’s principles or dump those principles and cosy up to corporate mates?

Advertisement

Watch this space.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

First published in the Tasmania Times on March 31, 2008.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mike Bolan is an independent complex systems and business consultant. Mike worked for the Tamar valley community and others to prepare materials for the RPDC in which he spent about a year visiting Tasmanian communities, businesses and individuals to learn the impacts of forestry operations and the implications of a pulp mill on them. The lessons learned from that period are still relevant today and are used in this story, which is told to inform not to gain income.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mike Bolan

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy