Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The government finally 'gets it'

By Antonio Buti - posted Wednesday, 13 February 2008


It is difficult to believe that those who still oppose an apology would not agree that it would be wrong to separate a child from their parents because of their race. Surely more is needed - such as neglect and danger. If that be the case, the past removal policy (removal based on race) was wrong and many have suffered.

It is a sign of respect and civility to now say “sorry”. This does not make the current generation responsible for the past policies but it is an acknowledgement that many Aboriginal people suffered as a result of the removal policy.

As a sign of that acknowledgement and as an example of good civil manners, the national parliament on behalf of the Australian society should apologise for an historical wrong. The apology is a sign that we empathise with those that were removed from their families - it is not an act of guilt.

Advertisement

Today’s apology in Parliament by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has the potential to be watershed in the history of relations between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australia. Time will tell if it is to be seen as an historical landmark, acquiring the status of a national symbol.

Many Australians hope it will be.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

45 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Antonio Buti is a Senior Lecturer in Law and JLV/Louis Johnson Memorial Trust Fellow, Law School, The University of Western Australia.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 45 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy