Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Critical lessons from the mill debacle

By Mike Bolan - posted Friday, 21 December 2007


The meetings were usually attended by other groups like Allens Consulting Group and members of Monash University’s Centre for Policy Studies, each of whom was rewarded with work from government and logging interests. Everyone present, except the government, had a pecuniary interest in going along with positive recommendations.

No one stood up for the public or for due diligence.

Remember Andersen Consulting?

Overall, the whole scenario is reminiscent of the Andersen Consulting debacle.

Advertisement

It turned out that, instead of independent consulting advice, Andersen acted more as a cheer squad for their paying clients thereby exposing their clients to unconsidered threats. Their clients used Andersen’s name and their glowing reports to justify share price and management salary increases. Everyone a winner, except the public duped into thinking everything was fine when it often was anything but.

When the one-sided and manipulative nature of Andersen’s activities become publicly known, a rapid and total collapse ensued.

In Tasmania we are facing the same kind of one sided cheer squad approach to large projects. A consulting arm for a sales outlet recommends their services/projects to government and to some private sector organisation. They offer economic models and benefit statements from other “happy” users, trips round the world and big dinners at the best restaurants. Taxpayers even paid for Gunns lobbyists to travel round the world with our MLCs to spruik the benefits of their proposal.

Taxpayers themselves were given no support, we just paid the bills.

Tasmanian Government (a kind alcoholic tabula rasa) went along with whatever their private sector mates said, on the basis that “it’s their money”. Sadly, with John Howard, we had a federal government that was totally compliant with big business so there were no waves from the Feds either. Anyone who raised an objection was tarred as Green, or anti-development, or just “misinformed”… and the circus continued.

Thus the state government not only failed totally in its public protection role, it actually took the side of the proponent and the multinational sales organisation and used taxpayers’ money to market their proposal.

Advertisement

We need to decide what government is there for, so that we can demand that we get value for our taxes.

Currently Tasmanians’ future is being written by a Finnish pulp mill supplier while our taxes are being used to help make the sale and no one checks the risks to industries and communities. This means that there are no plans to deal with any negative impacts because Gunns says there won’t be any. This is at odds with real experience with Poyry mill problems worldwide.

Perhaps to prove that “garbage in, garbage iut” still held true, Allens and Monash University produced economic models from financial information supplied by Poyry that “confirmed” the conclusions that they’d put into the computer in the first place.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

First published inthe Tasmania Times on December 14, 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mike Bolan is an independent complex systems and business consultant. Mike worked for the Tamar valley community and others to prepare materials for the RPDC in which he spent about a year visiting Tasmanian communities, businesses and individuals to learn the impacts of forestry operations and the implications of a pulp mill on them. The lessons learned from that period are still relevant today and are used in this story, which is told to inform not to gain income.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mike Bolan

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy