Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Bringing the 'gynocide' home to Aurukun

By Caroline Spencer - posted Tuesday, 18 December 2007


Feminists hit upon the idea of “gynocide” because they saw that groups of women had already been made ineligible for a viewpoint different to men. Women in prostitution were the major group of women in this category. Sexualised racism made Aboriginal women another group.

Feminists then saw more and more groups of women become ineligible for a viewpoint different to men. Rape conviction rates plummeted. The way that Helen Garner described university college women in 1997 (as effectively asking for sexual harassment) drew an angry response from feminists because it told us that another group of women had been “lost”.

Still, feminists wrote about gynocide mainly as a dystopia. But the Werribee and Aurukun cases have changed this. Girls, women and girls with a cognitive impairment, and women and girls targeted for gang rape by men were thought to be outside the group of women who weren’t allowed to say no. Feminists saw them as a final frontier of women who couldn’t possibly be painted with happy smiling faces “consenting” to whatever men did to them. But now the judiciary, as a major social institution, has said that even 10-year-old Aboriginal girls are part of the female group that men can legally buy for abuse.

Advertisement

The Werribee and Aurukun cases therefore leave feminists facing a bleak reality. If male society sees consent for the girls from Aurukun and Werribee, it sees consent for every single one of us. So feminists now have to admit to each other that the gynocide is here. We have to talk to each other using the name of our own gynocide: “consent”.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

36 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Caroline Spencer is a Melbourne writer.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Caroline Spencer

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 36 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy