Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Still not sorry!?

By Barbara Hocking - posted Thursday, 22 November 2007


Why have the federal acquisitions of Aboriginal lands without the "just terms" required by the Constitution  (a case already seeks to have this found unconstitutional) been accompanied by the suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act, and the weakening, if not the removal, of the traditional communities’ rights to negotiate with resource companies on proposals for exploration and development. ALP amendments opposing these provisions were rejected.

Moreover, there is to be a replacement of the existing standards and safeguards of the mining of uranium by new proposals being developed by the Howard Government's "high-level uranium advisory group". Doesn’t this indicate an agenda directed to the facilitation of an urgent rush to large-scale mining of uranium both for export and for use in a possible new nuclear industry to be set up in Australia under the pretext of it being a "clean" energy source?

Maintaining Our Souls

Advertisement

Captain Cook had disobeyed his Royal Instructions: "If he found the land inhabited", he was ordered to "take possession of suitable sites ... with the consent of the natives". Yet consent has still not been formally negotiated. To me, this failure to seek consent represents "unfinished constitutional business" for all of us; and the reconciliation process is needed to formalise the legal foundation of the international nation-state of Australia. By re-taking control of the Aboriginal lands in the Northern Territory in this way, the Howard government in their hearts is still not obeying those long-ago orders because it is refusing to acknowledge the continuation of the land ownership "since time immemorial" of the Aboriginal peoples of Australia. There are indeed proper reasons for help to be given and there are proper ways to do it. A land take-over that seems to be part of other agendas being pursued at the same time is not a proper way for us to "maintain our souls".

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

21 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Barbara Hocking BA,LLB; LLM; MA(prelim.). MIArb.A. was the first barrister briefed in the Mabo case. She was placed on the Victorian Honour Roll of Women 2006, was a Rockefeller Foundation Visiting Resident Fellow, Bellagio Study and Conference Center, Bellagio, Italy, 2002-03. She won the Distinguished Alumni Monash University Inaugural Award in 1993.
Barbara won the Australian Human Rights Medal 1992.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 21 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy