Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Nuclear vision - from inevitable to invisible

By James Norman - posted Friday, 23 November 2007


These include the fact that nuclear power is still illegal under federal environment legislation, it is prohibited by state parliaments up and down the east coast and nuclear waste transport, storage and disposal is against the law and strongly opposed by communities across Australia.

A re-elected Coalition government would have to be willing to try and override an array of state legislation and take control of the electricity grid and pricing across Australia to impose their nuclear reactor plan.

In addition, their proposed nuclear industry would need massive and perverse public subsidies to ever get off the ground.

Advertisement

At the opening of the meeting of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in Spain last week, Yvo de Boer, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change said failure to tackle climate change "would be nothing less than criminally irresponsible".

Instead of wasting our time with this nuclear distraction that is too costly, too slow and not popular, the people of Australia want and support investment in clean, renewable energy technologies, not nuclear power.

And, worryingly for Mr Howard, it seems many of his colleagues on the conservative side of politics are increasingly taking the same view.

Less than a week out from the federal election, former NSW Liberal leader and current NSW opposition energy spokesperson Peter Debnam told the NSW Energy Summit that "after looking at community concerns, construction costs and long-term decommissioning and storage costs, it is clear for Australia that renewables beat nuclear".

Having claimed the federal election was to be a mandate for nuclear power, in the space of just 12 months, the concept of Australia's nuclear future has gone from being John Howard's golden chalice to becoming his Achilles heel.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

97 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

James Norman is communications coordinator for the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons. He is a contributor to The Age, The Australian and the Herald Sun. He also wrote Bob Brown's biography for Allen & Unwin.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by James Norman

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of James Norman
Article Tools
Comment 97 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy