Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Peer review and public acessibility makes Open Source superior

By Richard Chirgwin - posted Wednesday, 27 August 2003


The role of copyright is to ensure that an inferior work is not sold under the name of a superior engineer.

If works are published and available for peer review, then the dishonest or inadequate designer has lost the shield of obscurity: he or she can't hide someone else's work inside an impenetrable "black box".

As in other engineering disciplines, publication would increase the chance that second-rate work - or dishonestly-presented work - is discovered. This is an important consideration in a world where software has become embedded in our social infrastructure. If software is as important as a building, then it should be accorded similar scrutiny.

Advertisement

Damage to Australian Industry

A widespread adoption of Open Source software would reduce the cost of inputs to the Australian software industry, without eliminating the value of skills in large projects.

"Shrinkwrap" software vendors could suffer, certainly: the software individuals buy at retail is the sector of the industry most associated with the Microsoft "ecosystem". Even then, however, I'm not certain of the impact, because I think for most people, convenience remains important. It's easier to install software from a CD than to find, assess and download it over the Internet.

Other sectors of the Australian industry would unequivocally benefit: those companies, for example, whose business is in what's known as "embedded systems" would cut their cost of inputs in an Open Source world.

Embedded systems developers here and overseas already use Open Source software because it improves rather than diminishes their profitability. You'll find Open Source operating systems in laser printers, photocopiers, network firewalls and very soon in mobile phones. Outside the consumer field, a great many telecommunications switches, defence systems, scientific computers, and industrial control systems likewise use Open Source operating systems as the basis of their software development.

Bugs

Healy argues that Open Source software has high bug counts (all software has high bug counts); clumsy operation (again, common to all software); and unfinished functionality (ditto).

This is not intrinsic to Open Source software, it's intrinsic to all software.

Advertisement

The main reason is the relative youth of the software industry. It's still subject to faddism and many individuals still resist the boring disciplines of engineering (such as rigorous education, repeatable experimentation, and professional certification).

The "copying of components" Healy decries is a good example.

"With software though, once the source code is made available, freeloaders can take that source code and build similar programs without doing all the development work," Healy writes.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All

Article edited by Eliza Brown.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Richard Chirgwin is editor of CommsWorld.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Richard Chirgwin
Related Links
CommsWorld
Open Source Institute
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy