Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Get-off-your-butt money!

By Jeremy Sammut - posted Friday, 21 September 2007


While unhealthy lifestyle is recognised as the major cause of chronic illness, what is not acknowledged is that Medicare encourages, subsidises, and rewards this behaviour by allowing the unhealthy to consume the bulk of the community’s health resources.

The AGPN’s solution to the obesity crisis is to continue down this path, and increase the reward for being unhealthy by creating yet another subsidy. And to what end? To “educate” people about what they surely must already know: that a poor diet and no exercise makes you obese.

But the incentives in the health system are set to change. As the population ages in coming decades, increasing numbers of elderly people in particular are going to suffer chronic illnesses. In some parts of Britain, health authorities have already moved to cut costs by denying expensive hip replacement surgery to obese people.

Advertisement

As the rising cost of treating “lifestyle” disease places an unsustainable strain on Medicare, similar bans are inevitable in Australia. Medicare simply will not be able to provide all possible therapies and procedures to all patients on demand. Lifestyle is set to become the key criteria used to refuse certain treatment to certain patients.

Rather than sit-up money, increasing the public’s awareness of the realities of healthcare in the 21st century, and what the consequences of a poor lifestyle will be, is a more effective way of tackling the obesity crisis. This should give people a real incentive to lose weight.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

18 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jeremy Sammut is a Research Fellow at the Centre for Independent Studies. Jeremy has a PhD in history. His current research for the CIS focuses on ageing, new technology, and the sustainability of Medicare. Future research for the health programme will examine the role of preventative care in the health system and the management of public hospitals. His paper, A Streak of Hypocrisy: Reactions to the Global Financial Crisis and Generational Debt (PDF 494KB), was released by the CIS in December 2008. He is author of the report Fatally Flawed: the child protection crisis in Australia (PDF 341KB) published by the CIS in June 2009.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jeremy Sammut

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 18 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy