Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The voices of experience: some hows, whys and whens of 50:50 shared care

By Anna Ferro, Bruce Smyth and Catherine Caruana - posted Friday, 22 August 2003


Among the parents who have 50:50 arrangements, the week-about arrangement was the most common. And a common theme among all participants was the strong desire for guidance from information or services to help ensure a shared-care arrangement was suitable for their particular circumstances, and to help develop a schedule that would fit those circumstances.

For instance, Kathy was happy to try a 50:50 care arrangement but was keen to have some information about how to set up a schedule. She pressed a Family Court mediator but to no avail.

It was an answer like "You have to work it out. You're an individual group and you need to do it." Which made it really difficult because then it looked like I was dictating terms to which he [her former spouse] repelled straight away.

Advertisement

Mothers and fathers appeared to have different motives in choosing shared parenting. For example, for many of the fathers, their own rights as parents appear to have been a key motivating factor for 50:50 care. By contrast, mothers appeared to be more child-focussed and were also motivated by the rights of the both the child and the father to continue their relationship. But that is not to say that fathers do not become child-focused as they become embedded in their children's lives.

One of the most conspicuous features of the 50:50 parents was that all were in paid employment. In the case of fathers, all had some degree of flexibility in their work hours. Several had even chosen to work a four-day week or less; several had also changed jobs (or stayed in jobs) to give them this flexibility. All of the fathers appeared to have framed their work patterns to care for their children. Mothers, on the other hand, found that paid employment gave them the ability to make choices for themselves and their children.

Both mothers and fathers who opt for shared care generally appear to be in a position financially to make choices about their work-family balance. Fathers who spend equal time with their children need access to family-friendly work patterns.

A defining feature of the fathers with shared care was the way in which they viewed contact. In asking them about the sorts of things that they did with their children, and if any aspects of contact (e.g. quantity, quality, predictability, flexibility) were more important than others, fathers spoke of how time gave them a chance to do simple things with children - quality things. Nigel expressed many of the fathers' thoughts on this issue: "What do I do with the kids? I'd say: I'm around them."

Shared parenting involving a 50:50 split is probably the most logistically complex parenting arrangement possible. It can place huge demands on children and parents. The complexity of shared care became abundantly clear during one interchange between two fathers, Rod and Nigel.

Rod: "We see each other all the time. Clothes? … I'm forever driving here and dropping off school clothes there …"

Advertisement

Nigel: "We have three sets of everything: one in each household and one set lost somewhere in-between. And it's kind of true that stuff gravitates one way and you've got to say: 'Hey! I'm out of this' or 'Where are all my towels?'"

Rod: "Or you do a big wash and say 'I've got everything!'"

Nigel: 'That really depends in my case on reasonable relations with my ex-wife. Reasonable relations make so much possible."

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

Article edited by David Paterson.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

This is an edited version of a paper presented to the Australian Social Policy Conference 2003 at The University of New South Wales, Sydney on 9-11 July and published in the Institute of Family Studies' journal Family Matters. Click here (pdf, 294kb) for the full paper.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Anna Ferro is a Research Officer in the Family and Marriage Program at the Australian Institute of Family Studies.

Bruce Smyth is a Research Fellow in the Family and Marriage Program at the Australian Institute of Family Studies.

Catherine Caruana is a Senior Research Officer in the Family and Marriage Program at the Australian Institute of Family Studies.

Related Links
Australian Institute of Family Studies
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy