Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

A radical political centre for whites?

By Vern Hughes - posted Thursday, 13 September 2007

Noel Pearson's quest for a "radical political centre" has won the respect of thoughtful Australians everywhere. It came out of a desperate search for an alternative to policy failure in Indigenous affairs.

But what about a "radical political centre" for whites? This quest is just as urgent. In all the big policy debates in national politics, a political centre which synthesises rights and responsibilities, freedom and obligation, individualism and social cohesion, is desperately needed but is nowhere on the agenda.

The Third Way debate in Europe and North America in the 1990s never reached Australia. Its only champion, Mark Latham, found himself in a party still wedded to a two-way highway, talking to a press gallery that could see only a bi-bolar universe.


So when Pearson speaks of the search for a “radical political centre”, why is this quest not understood by our political leaders and commentators?

The dominance of industrial relations on the national agenda is part of the answer. The IR agenda is still dominated by the competing interests of big business and trade union officialdom in a way that has remained largely unchanged since the 1890s.

That institutional contest spawned our two-party system from about 1910, and our unique quasi-judicial conciliation and arbitration arrangements from the time of federation. Both of these structures institutionalised a separation of labour and capital which ironically buttressed their mutual dependence. A whole army of union officials and business and labour lawyers owed their livelihoods to these institutions.

Sir Keith Hancock, perhaps our best historian, argued in the 1930s that the problem with these arrangements was that they prohibited any transformation of labour-capital relationships away from competing armies perennially preparing for war.

A “radical political centre” in IR is arguably important for the nation. But it won’t come out of our bi-polar IR institutions. Bi-polar institutions generate bi-polar thinkers.

These institutions have shaped our social policy too. Ideological war between teacher unions and elite private schools stymies the education debate. Doctors and public sector hospitals monopolise the health debate.


Social policy discussion is stuck in a pitchfork battle between service providers over funding. Consumers of services are not in the debate. They are invisible in the eyes of politicians and press galleries alike.

Whether health or disability or family support policies actually work or not, is not a question asked by politicians on either side. The only question debated is the volume of the spending.

Noel Pearson has taught us, from the tragedy of Indigenous dysfunction, that throwing money at services changes nothing. This is an insight from the radical political centre that is desperately needed in mental health, disability, schooling, health care, and especially in the current ill-conceived but fashionable notion of “community building” by spending spree.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Vern Hughes is Secretary of the National Federation of Parents Families and Carers and Director of the Centre for Civil Society and has been Australia's leading advocate for civil society over a 20-year period. He has been a writer, practitioner and networker in social enterprise, church, community, disability and co-operative movements. He is a former Executive Officer of South Kingsville Health Services Co-operative (Australia's only community-owned primary health care centre), a former Director of Hotham Mission in the Uniting Church, the founder of the Social Entrepreneurs Network, and a former Director of the Co-operative Federation of Victoria. He is also a writer and columnist on civil society, social policy and political reform issues.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Vern Hughes

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Vern Hughes
Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy