Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The science of history

By David Long - posted Friday, 14 September 2007


If, for Aristotle, man possessed speech and reason naturally, for Rousseau, man by nature was no different from any irrational beast; beginning to speak, and therefore think, by some chance natural phenomenon that brought men together and forced them to interact with one another. From Rousseau's premise, all human language and human thought - moral, political, and religious - are the purposeless effects of purposeless physical causes; whatever you might think.

Rousseau wants man to live a life according to his nature. But Rousseau’s man is a solitary individual first, and social only by training. Thus, social or civilised man is alienated from his natural state and his natural happiness. The source of his alienation is discoverable only in his history.

The science of history asserts that it alone understands man, that its truth about human affairs is superior to that of philosophy. Unfortunately, science can not validate its own claim. It will always rest on an assertion supported by nothing more than a philosophical argument.

Advertisement

Is there a point in learning history? Simply put, the answer is no. There is, however, a point in studying the history of ideas and to illustrate the history of ideas by reference to various historical events. Thus one could compare the founding of the American Republic and the ideas on which it was based with the founding of the French Republic and the ideas on which its revolution was based with some very illuminating consequences.

The history of Australia that offends Mr Howard might actually have been cut directly from Rousseau’s template. A happy life in the state of nature, the rural idyll destroyed by a civilisation that alienates the Indigenous people from everything they hold dear.

The irony of Mr Howard’s proposal for a new curriculum is that he has sought to change the history that is taught in the schools when what is taught in the universities is the real problem: for it is the university that teaches the future teachers a methodology that states that all value judgments are subjective. By the time they leave university, the teachers have already learnt that their personal opinions of the simple, natural, idyllic Aboriginal life and the violent military occupation of aboriginal lands by the British government and white settlers are subjective.

If Mr Howard wants to assist Aborigines he might begin by ensuring that white men and Aborigines are educated to understand the meaning of civilisation and why liberal democracy is superior to the regime of the tribe. For those who wish to start, they should acquire a copy of Professor Harry Jaffa’s book on Abraham Lincoln, A New Birth of Freedom. Professor Jaffa’s understanding of the political science of republican government is unequalled.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

17 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Long is a lawyer and writer with an interest in classical political philosophy and Shakespeare. He has written previously for The Bulletin and The Review.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Long

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 17 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy