Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The Dwarf Lords: tiny devices, tiny minds and the new enslavement

By Julian Cribb - posted Tuesday, 4 September 2007


XXX

I have chosen to highlight one of the risks of the nanotechnologies in dystopian terms because, while we hear much about its potential benefits and wonders from its developers, we hear little objective discussion of the possible downsides and mis-applications.

Every technology ever invented has downsides. Indeed most of science today is taken up with amending the mistakes made through the use, overuse or misuse of previous technologies - as global climate change illustrates. My proposals for addressing this issue are:

Advertisement
  1. all funding for nanotechnology research should carry with it an obligation to direct a proportion of the funds to ethical and sociological research into the consequences and human rights impact of the technology on society;
  2. all institutions performing nanotechnology research should be required to enter a genuine dialogue with the public about their science and where it is leading - and to heed what they hear;
  3. governance of nanoscience should operate under a externally-reviewed Code of Conduct which obligates those involved to take into account ethical concerns and potential for misapplication;
  4. companies producing nano products should be legally liable for their misapplication, much more extensively than is currently the case in simple product safety;
  5. safeguards must be put in place, urgently, regarding the use of personal data, the reasons it may be aggregated, where it may be aggregated from and who is allowed access to it. This must be totally transparent;
  6. new human rights must be established to prevent the misuse of such data and technology; and
  7. there should be a worldwide debate among leading lawyers, philosophers, politicians and scientists about the implications of nanoscience for the future of global and national societies, leading to new laws to circumscribe its abuse, misuse or harmful application.

No doubt many will dismiss this as colourful scaremongering.

I can only say that I remember writing my first newspaper article on greenhouse in 1976 or 77, based on a CSIRO report back then, when it was universally regarded as scaremongering. It has taken 30 years for an educated consensus to be reached around the planet, and will take at least another 20 for anything worthwhile to be done about it, and centuries for it to take effect.

If we are to anticipate the nanocracy, we don’t have 50 years. According to the best estimates, the first quantum computers will be on line in half that time and most of the basic surveillance tools are going in now.

For once, we have a clear opportunity to act in advance of a disruptive new technology, to capture its benefits and to avert or limit its dangers. For the sake of our ancient human freedoms and our right to a creative and progressive future, please let us do so.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. All

This article is based on a paper presented at The Governance of Science and Technology, a Joint GovNet/CAPPE/UNESCO Conference on August 9-10, 2007 at the Australian National University.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

32 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Julian Cribb is a science communicator and author of The Coming Famine: the global food crisis and what we can do to avoid it. He is a member of On Line Opinion's Editorial Advisory Board.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Julian Cribb

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Julian Cribb
Article Tools
Comment 32 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy