Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Politics and the art of war

By Greg Barns - posted Friday, 31 August 2007


It is not as though there are not artists, ideas and creative gestures worth heeding in this regard but we need to stop for a moment and reflect on the quality and impact of their perceptions of contemporary warfare. Of all the films, plays, books, poems, songs, art and music that the war in Iraq and the war on terror has spawned, are there any that we can yet rank with Owen's Anthem , Shostakovich's Seventh Symphony or Picasso's Guernica?

Dare we say none, except for Michael Moore's powerful polemic documentary, Fahrenheit 9/11? Moore's documentary tears into myths and political beliefs, juxtaposing his findings with a charismatic antithetical ordinary guy heroism which is all too rare in today's creative media.

This is not the way it should be. As a society, finding ourselves seemingly locked in interminable conflict in Iraq and the war on terror, we should assess and elevate artistic endeavour to the level of powerful symbolism of collective protest and disquiet - serving to remind politicians and propagandists that they cannot pull the wool over our eyes all of the time.

Advertisement

Are we so immune to the shock of conflict that there is nothing for the artist to say? Are artists capable of speaking to the general public on subjects as personal as the perception of conflict without the codification of the academy's theoretical rhetoric? Or is it that we no longer look to the artist to help us make sense of the world, because we are not only desensitised but are constantly bombarded by news? Perhaps not even Guernica would take our breath away today.

It would be devastating if the answer to all these questions was simply “yes”.

For if it is right that the artist no longer has that pivotal role in making us search within as to why war is happening, then we are failing ourselves.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Age on August 25, 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Greg Barns is National President of the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Greg Barns

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Greg Barns
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy