Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Want to really engage the community? Don't walk under Arnstein's ladder

By Peter Henderson - posted Monday, 18 August 2003


Community Consultation is sadly positioned as a tokenistic gesture, an idea still being advanced today, and has marginalised the serious interest and worth of community consultation as a worth process of community engagement.

Consultation, particularly community consultation, with regard to policy decision-making or planning proposals such as an REF or EIS, is the cornerstone of meaningful participation or engagement. You ask the community what they think, and if they don't agree with a proposal you ask them why and take this into account in making your decision. Then you explain the reasons.

If properly conducted, community consultation will achieve a far more equitable decision-making process. In accepting the reality of the modern democratic system in which we live and operate, it underpins the very idea of citizen control that Arnstein advocated but without the anarchistic overtones of French students rushing the barricades.

Advertisement

If used correctly, consultation is the foundation of information provision and establishes the necessary partnership that lets meaningful participation occur. Sadly, all too often community consultation simply comprises an opinion poll as to whether the decision already made is acceptable to a community, and if not, well too bad - let the power struggle commence.

More often than not a PR consultant (euphemistically named in this instance) is engaged to put the best possible spin on the decision and in the event of community concern or opposition, then move into damage control.

A lack of transparency in the process and a limited degree of accountability in determining whether the consultation has been carried out to any degree of community satisfaction has positioned community consultation within the framework of participation advanced by Arnstein. In so doing it will continue to be marginalised and tokenistic.

It is clear from the research and the texts that people want to be included in the decision-making agenda, especially if it has the potential to impact on their lives or locale. Why wouldn't they? People appreciate being consulted but communities are in danger of experiencing consultation overload and little tangible results apparent for their efforts.

Professional planners and policy makers know how to turn data into information, information into knowledge, and knowledge into policy, plans and projects. Too often, however, community groups are participants at the last stage, and without the data or technical knowledge to articulate or even substantiate their positions.

Community consultation should not be a difficult concept. It is about timing and a commitment to the consultation process at the outset of planning. Genuine consultation requires regulators and planners to present information to a community in a user-friendly fashion and at a timely point in the planning process. They need to develop a habit of listening to the public and, importantly in terms of closing the communications loop, provide useful and useable feedback and data to allow that public to make an informed contribution.

Advertisement

Increasingly, the public expects to be consulted. Today planners cannot overlook or revoke this right for a community to be consulted about projects and developments which will impact on the day-to-day lives without risking public anger and suspicion.

Community consultation is not about divesting planning power to a community but rather keeping an open mind with regard to legitimate community concerns about a proposal. In soliciting input and ideas about such a planning proposal, it's about taking the time and effort to provide information and explanations back to those concerned communities.

This offers many advantages for both the planner and the community for which the plan is planned. Informed people make informed decisions. Decision making is not a contest. It is about engaging a community and providing the best workable solutions.

Consultation assists this process. Its time to step out from the shadow of Arnstein's ladder.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Peter Henderson is conducting post graduate research into Community Consultation at the University of the Sunshine Coast.

Related Links
Feature: How to engage with citizens
University of the Sunshine Coast
Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy