Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The pursuit of terrorists post September 11: be afraid, be very afraid …

By Andrew Boe - posted Thursday, 2 August 2007


Also, other than for offences that impose mandatory life imprisonment, such as murder, it is assumed that as long as risks are appropriately addressed, an accused person is entitled to be free until such time as an independent judicial process determines guilt. These are important protections which set us apart from the arbitrary detention and political abuse of power that existed, for example, under Saddam Hussein and still exists in places such as Burma and Zimbabwe.

We rightly cite this balance as being an indication of Australia's maturity as a democracy and our sophistication in governance.

However, the 2004 laws under which Dr Haneef has been detained bear almost no relation to these principles, and indeed intentionally demolish many of them.

Advertisement

First, the Act permitted the government to detain the doctor in a police cell for two weeks without any charge. This is despite his having co-operatively answered hundreds of questions from the AFP on the very first day.

Second, after this interrogation the government was allowed to withhold from Dr Haneef and his lawyers' critical evidence relied upon by the government's lawyers in charging him and seeking his detention prior to any trial. The court can be shown this material and is required to act upon it without ever receiving any argument against that evidence by Dr Haneef.

Third, the presumption of innocence is significantly diminished by requiring Dr Haneef to demonstrate "exceptional circumstances" in order to be released on bail.

Fourth, after having managed to do that before an independent court he remained in custody because a government minister determined that Haneef had failed a "character test" within our migration laws. Dr Haneef has to now seek a Federal Court review of the Minister's decision before he has any prospect of being able to resume his work as a doctor.

It was not the system that finally rescued Dr Haneef, rather the effective investigation of the matter by a handful of journalists and editors in the media, especially from The Australian newspaper. Our collective liberties cannot be reliant on similar enthusiasm being shown whenever a person is accused of these crimes.

Other commentators and indeed Dr Haneef's lawyers have amply demonstrated specific limitations in how the government's case was proceeded with. However, let us assume that the government's conduct is "lawful" in the sense that this is what they intended the legislation to permit. What does it say about our respect for universal rights? And perhaps more importantly, how much safer are our children from the real acts of terror?

Advertisement

It is probable that if any real terrorists are caught by the AFP, the government's framework will be effective and they are unlikely to be released before trial. In that sense we are protected. But it will also catch many other people who are clearly not terrorists nor in any way supportive of terrorism. It will catch young men like Haneef, who obtained qualifications as a doctor and gained legitimate entry into Australia to work in our understaffed health system.

A year earlier he had been so "reckless" as to give his cousin his SIM card without knowing his cousin's future purposes. He would later be accused of a connection with an act of terrorism on the other side of the world. Haneef's cousin has been investigated by the British authorities, and reportedly cleared of any association with any terrorist organisation. Contrary to what was originally submitted by the DPP, the SIM card was not in fact found in the car used in the attempted bomb attack.

How these and other misstatements were made warrant an independent inquiry and made the criminal allegations against Haneef a complete farce.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

Andrew Boe acted for the first person charged with a terrorism offence in Queensland. His association with the magistrate who granted Haneef bail is such that he makes no comment as to the correctness of her decision. He will be appearing at a Community Forum: Anti-Terror Laws and Your Civil Rights on September 2, 2007 at the Multi-Faith Centre, Griffith University (Nathan Campus). First published in The Brisbane Line on August 1, 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

126 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Andrew Boe is a lawyer in private practice in Brisbane. He specialises in criminal law defence and administrative law cases. Andrew has appeared or acted in some significant cases in Queensland and NSW. He has an interest in legal issues involving the Aboriginal community, crime and corrections. He was born in Burma and has an interest in the democratic movement in that country.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 126 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from The Brisbane Institute
 The pursuit of terrorists post September 11: be afraid, be very afraid …
 The politics of country music
 Confronting our water challenge
 Hanging on to paradise
 Taxing Australian federalism
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy