Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The 'visionary' council mergers leave many out in the cold

By Ben Rees - posted Wednesday, 1 August 2007


Statistically, Dalby together with Wambo could elect 4.2 councillors and most likely the mayor. Chinchilla could elect 1.7 councillors whilst Tara 1.04. The western extremity of the new regional area of Murilla and Taroom will elect 0.7 and 0.3 councillors respectively. What a statistical mess for a “visionary” political system aiming to deliver equitable and just representation.

Murilla and Taroom will have to co-operate to elect one councillor. Chinchilla and Tara could combine to elect three councillors. This would leave Dalby and Wambo four councillors plus the mayor. Political and economic power will reside geographically in the eastern extremity of the Regional Council.

If electors from the eastern end of Chinchilla and Tara (both adjoin Wambo) supported a Wambo candidate, the situation becomes ever more geographically distorted. Five councillors from the former Dalby-Wambo Shires plus the mayor would come from the eastern extremity of the Region. This would recreate a mini Queensland situation with political and economic power dominated by a small densely populated geographic area.

Advertisement

Both the premier and minister have said that the way is still open for the new system to be divided into wards. It has been left to a group of western mayors to devise a system of division. When the statistics of the new Dalby Regional Council is considered, there can be no equitable representation unless it is heavily gerrymandered in favour of the numerically weak areas.

Candidate selection becomes crucial. Talented candidates could find themselves unable to command sufficient electoral support compared to lesser talented; but, more popular personalities. Numerical strength will reside in the towns. In other words, town candidates are more likely to win a council seat than farmers. Hence rural industry representation is most likely to decline at regional level with an impairment of diversity of thought and industry representation in regional politics.

The outcome of this situation will provide party politics an opportunity to enter regional government. It has always been a point of local government pride that official party politics has been unable to capture interest at local government level. This must end for any semblance of representation to emerge. While town representation would normally be the repository of Liberal and Labor interests, resentment generated from this reform could well work against Labor across the board reaching to the federal level.

The distance from Dalby town to Wandoan (division 2, Taroom) is 194km. An equivalent example for a Brisbane residents would be to have a councillor elected from Tiaro (south of Maryborough). Conversely, because the numerical power lies in  Brisbane, a Tiaro resident would be represented most likely by a Brisbane councillor. This system cannot be explained except by philosophy.

This reform process reflects the philosophical thinking of the technocrats recruited by Labor’s in the 1950’s and 60’s internal reform process. The question now becomes: is this the first wave of neo-technocratic philosophy?

Philosophical thinking from the past is no basis to go forward for regional Queensland.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ben Rees is both a farmer and a research economist. He has been a contributor to QUT research projects such as Rebuilding Rural Australia. Over the years he has been keynote and guest speaker at national and local rural meetings and conferences. Ben also participated in a 2004 Monash Farm Forum.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ben Rees

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ben Rees
Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy