Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Hirsi Ali: an apostle of liberal democracy and of secularism?

By Mark Bahnisch - posted Friday, 15 June 2007


It’s significant that Szego, and other pundits such as Janet Albrechtsen and Miranda Devine, loudly castigated the “secular left”, but they were unable to cite anyone who actually defended the practice of female genital mutilation on “cultural” grounds, the key point of their critique.

Szego could only refer to what she described as a “little blogosphere spat”. However, Larvatus Prodeo blogger Kim Jameson was in fact arguing that practical solidarity with organisations fighting female genital mutilation within their own cultural milieu was a much more genuine manner of registering concern than “loud denunciations” motivated seemingly by political factors.

As with many other buttons pushed in the Culture Wars, it appears now that reasoned debate is completely eclipsed by the desire to construct a mythical political opponent to attack.

Advertisement

To demonise those who would suggest that the most practical way of countering the sorts of abuses Hirsi Ali herself suffered is to give support to women working within African communities is a prime example of this flagrant disregard for reason.

Those on the left who find female genital mutilation repulsive are perfectly entitled to suggest that its practitioners are more likely to be convinced by people arguing from within their own cultural and religious traditions. This is not inconsistent with the view that the practice should be illegal in Australia. And nor is it inconsistent with the rejection of “cultural” justifications for such horrors.

Multiculturalism, properly understood, in a liberal society does not and should not condone any practice, justified by whatever reason, which does such physical and psychological harm.

Holding Hirsi Ali up as some kind of political shibboleth, and contending that disagreement with her opinions represents some kind of heresy merely demonstrates that the values of Enlightenment reason are honoured as much in the breach as in the observance in Australian political debate.

It would show far more respect for her, and for her suffering and her courage, to treat her arguments on their merits rather than use her views as a political football in domestic culture wars. Above all, it would be much more reasonable.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Susan Prior.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

33 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Mark Bahnisch is a sociologist and a Fellow of the Centre for Policy Development. He founded the leading public affairs blog, Larvatus Prodeo.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark Bahnisch

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 33 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy