Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Senator Heffernan's 'Bulletin' blurt

By Natasha Cica - posted Thursday, 10 May 2007


Bill Heffernan's comments about Julia Gillard's alleged unfitness for public office because of being "deliberately barren" are - exactly what? Kevin Rudd quickly came up with "positively outlandish" as a response, which pretty much hits the bullseye. And from the target in question, Gillard herself: "Mr Heffernan's a man of the past, with very old-fashioned views."

This isn't the first time Gillard's been whacked ad feminem in relation to the state of her domestic interior life - no bananas on that kitchen sideboard, no baby puke crusting that neatly striped lapel. By now she probably has all the responses down pat - maybe memorised with appropriate variants of emphasis according to news outlet - and is possibly not as riled as she justifiably could be.

Whatever anyone may say about Julia Gillard, unprofessional and unprepared are not among the slurs that stick. The challenges of her industrial relations portfolio should never be underestimated, including issues such as Australian Workplace Agreements meeting Western Australia's mining boom, and managing the volatile combination of seriously big-gun stakeholders such as BHP Billiton, the trade union movement and Labor factional warlords.

Advertisement

Very high stakes and very big boys. Next to all of that, Heffernan looks like - well, you fill in that blank.

If that truth comes to shove, Senator Heffernan's Bulletin blurt probably came as a welcome relief to Gillard. It was getting pretty hot in her kitchen (industrial relations, remember?) for a minute there. It may do so again, but Heffernan has handed her and her leader, Kevin Rudd, a handy breathing space to regroup. Worse than that, from the Coalition's perspective, Heffernan's thrown his own boss on to the ropes, by revisiting the brutal socio-biological fact that Howard, too, is starting to look like a man of the past.

Howard can't help nudging 70 years of age, of course. But as prime minister, and one not averse to wielding the disciplinary lash when backbenchers go on frolics of their own of which he does not disapprove, he is responsible for his deliberately chosen responses when they do.

"Bill is a very good friend of mine and he remains a very dear friend of mine" is not the best opening line here, Mr Howard, even if you do point out he's not speaking for you or the government. Nor is this a great closer: "People say funny things all the time and the question of whether they apologise for them is a matter for them. If she wants to take that up with him, well, look, she can."

Translation (undented by Heffernan's apology much later in a long political day): Defend your own honour, girlie, I won't do it for you. Take-out message: I'm old-fashioned, too - but not up for chivalry.

Of course, it's a modern world, and a childless professional woman well knows how to look after herself in a range of bearpits. If she does need sisterly solace on this front, Gillard should take heart from the recent example of Vanessa Goodwin, the federal Liberal candidate for the Tasmanian seat of Franklin. During preselection Goodwin was the subject of a smear campaign from what Liberal insiders aptly call their ugly faction. Aspersions were cast on her appreciation of family values, hung on the hook of the facts that she is unmarried and childless. Goodwin won that day, and Gillard won this.

Advertisement

And at the end of the much bigger day of election 2007, it will be what voting Australians - including women and men a lot more switched on than Heffernan - think of Gillard, and of Goodwin for that matter, which will help deliver the verdict that matters.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

First published in The Age on May 3, 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

18 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Natasha Cica is the director of Periwinkle Projects, a Hobart-based management, strategy and communications consultancy.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Natasha Cica

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Natasha Cica
Article Tools
Comment 18 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy