Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Unity needed at the coalface

By Mark Christensen - posted Thursday, 3 May 2007


As a result, coal companies are often more interested in strategising than agreeing to what is best for the system as a whole. These dynamics are exacerbated by the absence of hard-and-fast rules for allocating the costs of different rail or port options and the unsophisticated contracting arrangements between the parties that have been shaped by history, not the commercial realities of a post-NCP, boom economy.

If the coal companies and governments really want optimal performance of the Queensland coal system they should be willing to re-constitute responsibilities and ownership arrangements.

One obvious option is to follow Toll Holding's lead by creating two separate services and infrastructure companies with mine-to-ship responsibilities. The existing stakeholders would jointly own relevant rail and port services and assets vended in two new organisations. A commercial relationship between the two would ensure an integrated approach. There could also be provisions allowing for the entry of new mines, thus avoiding a Pilbara-like fracas.

Advertisement

There are political positives from unlocking significant shareholder and community value. The rail network for the Bowen Basin could be separated out without material impact on the remaining Queensland rail system. The Beattie Government has consistently welcomed public-private company structures as a way of improving performance, while freeing up capital for social infrastructure. This structure would allow it to stay involved in infrastructure, while removing itself from the riskier logistics side of the business.

The right corporate structure should also allow a scaling back of regulation, consistent with the Federal Government's demands.

Re-arranging the Queensland coal system is something of a radical idea - though it shouldn't be. The market is moving towards a new business model that could improve the fortunes of all stakeholders if they could find the commitment to implement it.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in the Australian Financial Review on April 23, 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark is a social and political commentator, with a background in economics. He also has an abiding interest in philosophy and theology, and is trying to write a book on the nature of reality. He blogs here.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark Christensen

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy