Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Where was the reality? Manipulation and misinformation in Iraq

By Paul Malone - posted Monday, 28 July 2003


The sooner the population understands that the "victors" will face a long war of occupation, the better. Past IRA operations in Northern Ireland demonstrate that it only takes a tiny armed and committed minority to wreak havoc over years. Iraq has more than a sufficient share of the population sympathetic to an anti-Western position, and they have enough arms to run an endless guerrilla campaign.

During the invasion, Prime Minister John Howard repeatedly justified Australia's involvement on the grounds that we had to rid Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction. He was not pressed to provide evidence of the existence of such weapons, despite statements before the invasion by Chief UN inspector Hans Blix's that progress was being made in disarmament, and statements from chief nuclear weapons inspector, Dr ElBaradei, that he had found no evidence that Iraq had revived its nuclear weapons program. "Where's the evidence Prime Minister?" should have been the repeated question to Mr Howard. "Why not adopt the French/German plan, given that progress is being made?" might have been another.

At least John Howard faced question. In the US, the media and the population suffered repeated orchestrated media grabs. How often did President Bush face a sustained session of critical questions? How, in a supposed democracy, could a leader taking a country into war, be allowed to get away with so little direct questioning?

Advertisement

It is often said that the media should be "balanced" - as if there were only two positions and it was only a matter of finding the fulcrum. But there are many points of view, and an overwhelming volume of information. Journalists, editors, news editors and producers have choices. One "balance" could be to devote as much news time to the results -- the casualties of the war, the killed and injured -- as to the military front.

In the end, all we can hope for is the reporting of facts (as opposed to the speculation we saw so much of); the questioning of claims; and the provision of as many perspectives as possible. The International Federation of Journalists and the Federation of Arab Journalists has called for a new media order that reflects the highest standards of pluralism, press freedom and editorial independence. This is as good a summary of objectives as we are likely to get.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

An edited version of this article was published in Issue 22 of The Walkley Magazine.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Paul Malone spent 20 years working as a journalist for The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, The Australian Financial Review and The Canberra Times.

Related Links
International Federation of Journalists
Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance
US Military Central Command
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy