Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Could we have a more egalitarian society?

By Kirrily Jordan and Frank Stilwell - posted Monday, 30 April 2007


Intergenerational equity in access to environmental assets is a key tenet of the case for ecological sustainability - so that future generations are not denied access to environmental assets by the rapacious activities of the present generation.

The inherent connection between the objective of ecological sustainability and egalitarian concerns about social justice comes through strongly in this sort of thinking about new directions for public policy. Making progress in these policy areas is not simple, of course. As with all progressive political, economic and social change, there is a need for critique, vision, strategy and organisation. We need a critique of the prevailing situation, vision about the characteristics of a better society, a strategy for getting from here to there, and political organisation to bring about the transition.

These are difficult requirements, but not impossibly difficult. The growing support for the Green Party, for example, reflects the concerns about issues of social justice and economic efficiency - interpreted as using our economic resources effectively to serve social goals - as well as concerns about environmental quality.

Advertisement

There are other significant pressure points, too. The trade union movement periodically shows its capacity to embrace industrial and social reforms as well as protection of the immediate interest of current union members - but it could do more. Under the leadership of Greg Combet and Sharan Burrow, the ACTU has shown that it can effectively represent the interests of the workforce in general, especially when faced with a threat such as that posed by WorkChoices.

Meanwhile, a broad array of non-governmental organisations is actively pursuing alternative political agendas, challenging the dominant neoliberal orthodoxy and the associated obsessions with material acquisitiveness and economic growth.

It is not surprising that so many people’s primary concern has been with getting a bigger personal slice of the national income and wealth - through capital gains and other unearned incomes, if possible - rather than creating better overall social outcomes. The social costs of this process are now evident.

More people can be expected to question the point of further affluence for the already affluent. It is increasingly apparent that it is neither fulfilling nor sustainable. Egalitarian ideals and policy practices are crucial in these circumstances.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

NOTE: The issues raised in this paper are explored more fully in a forthcoming book by the authors, titled Who Gets What? Analysing Economic Inequality in Australia and to be published by Cambridge University Press in June 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

28 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Kirrily Jordan is a research assistant in Political Economy at the University of Sydney and currently undertaking a PhD in Finance and Economics at the University of Technology, Sydney.

Frank Stilwell is Professor of Political Economy at the University of Sydney. He is the coordinating editor of the Journal of Australian Political Economy. He is the author of eleven books and co-editor of four others. His new book, co-authored with Kirrily Jordan and just published by Cambridge Universty Press, is called Who Gets What? Analysing Economic Inequality in Australia.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Kirrily Jordan
All articles by Frank Stilwell

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 28 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy