Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Fresh debate in Israel

By Graham Cooke - posted Wednesday, 7 March 2007


“The Mecca Agreement strongly supports [Palestinian President Mahmoud] Abbas in his mission to deal with the Israelis. The Hamas-Fatah agreement clearly identifies the Palestinian Liberation Organisation as the party entrusted to continue negotiations,” he writes.

With the vast majority of Palestinians, Arab countries, the US and the international community all in agreement on a two-state solution “what is missing now is for the Israelis to agree to begin talks on how to accomplish this goal.”

Brookings Institution Research Fellow Stacie Pettyjohn is more cautious. “The weakness of both Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert makes it unlikely that final-status negotiations will begin, let along succeed, in the near future,” she says.

Advertisement

“Nevertheless, a Palestinian government founded on the principles of the Mecca Agreement will be more willing and better able to resume meaningful negotiations with Israel. This would lead to interim accords, such as a ceasefire and prisoner exchanges, which would lay the foundation for further diplomacy and help begin a process of rebuilding trust between the parties.”

Mr Abdulhadi agrees. He believes the Palestinian people will not wait another 100 years for a settlement, but may well be prepared to wait another 10 if they see progress being made. From the Palestinian side the three major issues are the 1967 boundaries, the status of Jerusalem and the rights of refugees driven from their land when the Israeli state was set up in 1948.

He optimistically believes that all three sticking points are solvable. In a peaceful two-state solution the 1967 boundaries would be secure for Israel. “Israeli settlers could remain on the West Bank providing they accept Palestinian citizenship,” he says. “Palestinians have lived all over the world, they are happy with the concept of a multicultural society.”

Jerusalem could be the capital for both countries, perhaps under some kind of “international city” status where access to holy sites was guaranteed for all religions.

As for the refugees, most of the originals are dead and their descendants are well established elsewhere - “the economy of Jordan would collapse without them”. He believes that as long as Israel recognises the “concept” of a return, Palestinians will not insist on it in practice.

This is an overly simplistic view of a multi-faceted and engrained problem which has stubbornly refused solution for 60 years, at the same time costing hundreds of thousands of lives and bringing misery and uncertainty to millions more.

Advertisement

It is for this very reason that developments such as the Mecca Agreement should be given careful consideration and not dismissed, in the words of one US diplomat, as “a complication”. The time is ripe for a fresh debate and a little flexible thinking in Israel and around Western capitals.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

69 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Cooke has been a journalist for more than four decades, having lived in England, Northern Ireland, New Zealand and Australia, for a lengthy period covering the diplomatic round for The Canberra Times.


He has travelled to and reported on events in more than 20 countries, including an extended stay in the Middle East. Based in Canberra, where he obtains casual employment as a speech writer in the Australian Public Service, he continues to find occasional assignments overseas, supporting the coverage of international news organisations.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Cooke

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Cooke
Article Tools
Comment 69 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy