Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

A wide gap between law and justice

By George Williams - posted Wednesday, 10 January 2007


The law is never far from the front pages, with last year being no exception. We have seen criminals jailed, the difficulty of bringing others to trial and Australians sentenced to death overseas.

What these day-to-day controversies miss is the big picture of the state of our legal system. That picture shows a wide gap between law and justice. Too often in Australia, they are not the same. I suggest four areas where the legal system is broken and should be fixed. The list could be much longer.

For example, I could also point out where the law has failed vulnerable children or where freedom of government information laws mean the opposite of what they suggest.

Advertisement

First, we need to recognise that justice is denied to those who cannot afford it. Long-standing cuts to legal aid and too few community legal centres mean that people often do not get their day in court. What is the point of a legal system if those in need cannot access it?

Even where someone gets to court, they may not get a fair hearing. Many, often desperate, people are forced to appear in courts without legal help. Judges do their best, but a case in which one side has legal advice and the other does not is stacked one way.

Second, we need to fix our dysfunctional federal system. Our foundation law, the Australian Constitution, needs to be modernised. It established a system of government that made a lot of sense in the 1890s, but now does not work as it should.

Instead of clear lines of responsibility, our two levels of government often seek credit for successes but blame someone else when faced with failure. In a state like Queensland, the impact is being felt in hospitals and schools. While the money lies in Canberra, the responsibility lies primarily with the state. This mismatch is undermining the quality of these essential services.

The Business Council of Australia has found that our inefficient federal system is costing taxpayers an extra, wasted $9 billion each year. The larger impact on the economy has been estimated at about $20 billion.

This shows the cost of having two levels of government in a system that allows administrative duplication and political buck-passing.

Advertisement

This long-term problem is often neglected in the short period between elections. However, it is now so pressing and the consequences so obvious that 2007 should mark the year that Peter Beattie's call for a constitutional convention is taken up.

Third, David Hicks needs to be given a fair trial or returned to Australia. Even though an Australian citizen, Hicks has been held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as an "unlawful combatant" for more than five years. This has occurred with barely a murmur of protest from the Federal Government.

Hicks has not been tried and has been kept in conditions worse than would be expected in Australia for the worst convicted criminals, including at times solitary confinement for 23 hours a day.

His case is an affront to our commitment to the rule of law and to the idea that every person should be treated fairly. This time next year, we can only hope that Hicks is not facing the sixth anniversary of his imprisonment.

Finally, we need a national law that protects citizen's rights from government. Australia is now alone among all democratic nations in not having a national charter of rights or human rights law. In 2006, this meant that even the right to vote was whittled away. A law passed mid-year means that many young people will not vote in the next federal election.

This is due to the premature closing of the electoral roll on the day that writs for the election are issued.

Other laws have affected our freedom of speech, such as the sedition law that jails people not for what they do but for what they say.

There are signs, at least in this area, of change for the better. This year Victoria enacted a Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities. It is an ordinary act of Parliament that protects civil and political rights that have broad popular support. It is a safe model that Queensland and a federal government could follow.

Australian law needs change. The costs of not doing so are high. Without reform, we will limit our economic prosperity and continue a number of injustices, both large and small.

2007 ought to be the year that we get the law reform agenda back on track.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

First published in The Courier-Mail on December 25, 2006.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

George Williams is the Anthony Mason Professor of law and Foundation Director of the Gilbert + Tobin Centre of Public Law at the University of New South Wales.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by George Williams

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of George Williams
Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy