Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Appointing judges judiciously

By Geoffrey Davies - posted Wednesday, 6 September 2006


One way of doing this may be, in each case, to follow the maximal approach and to see where the woman candidate who is professionally most highly qualified is ranked and the extent, if any, of the gap between the professionally most highly qualified candidate and that woman.

Other factors relevant to this question may be the existing proportion in the court of women judges and the recent proportional rate of appointment of women judges to that court. The compromise, if any, should then be made in the light of those, and perhaps other factors.

The powers of existing judicial appointment bodies range from a power to appoint through a power to recommend a panel from which the appointment must be made, to a power merely to recommend a panel from which the government must either select the appointee or explain why.

Advertisement

Having an independent commission which itself has power to appoint is, in my opinion, an ideal to be aimed at but not a realistic possibility in Australia in the foreseeable future.

But it may be possible to persuade government to establish a commission with the power to recommend a panel of names from which the government must choose - or at least one having that power to recommend, with an obligation on government to explain any failure to appoint from that panel.

One reason why that may be possible is the realistic possibility that such an independent body might be established, in any event, without government approval.

Though the establishment of such a body without government approval would be only a last resort if the government could not be persuaded to constitute an independent recommending commission, it nevertheless merits serious consideration.

A body having the constituent members referred to earlier could be formed by agreement among those members, and act in accordance with the principles I have outlined.

And it could, whenever a judicial vacancy arises, make a recommendation to government by submitting a panel of names of no less than three qualified candidates selected by the committee in accordance with those principles.

Advertisement

Importantly, the panel should also indicate to government that, in accordance with the principles by which it was constituted, if the government refused to appoint someone from that panel, the committee would publicise that fact.

The publication of that fact would be some indication to the public that the appointment was made for political reasons rather than because the appointee was the person most qualified for the appointment.

And it might be some incentive to government not to use judicial appointment as a means of political patronage. 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All

Article edited by Allan Sharp.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

This is an edited and abridged version of Hon Geoffrey Davies' speech to the QUT Faculty of Law free public lecture on August 31, 2006. Read the full speech (pdf 112KB).



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

The Hon Geoffrey Davies AO is Former Justice of Appeal (1991-2005), Court of Appeal, Supreme Court of Queensland.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from QUT
 The science of reporting climate change
 Why schools need more than a business plan
 Suburban resilience
 Science unlimited
 Wake-up call for science
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy