Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

There goes the neighbourhood

By Ian Davidoff and Andrew Leigh - posted Wednesday, 30 August 2006

With the drift to private education, parents' preferences for schools are under the microscope. Nearly 35 per cent of Australian school students attend non-government schools and the rate has been steadily rising. A common perception is that many more parents would go private if only they could afford it.

Implicit in the last claim is the notion that when it comes to deciding on their child's education, parents face a clear choice: send your child to an expensive private school or a free public one. But is this characterisation accurate? Are public schools really free; and, if not, how much are parents willing to pay for them?

To find out how much public schools really cost, we recently looked at (pdf 977KB) the relationship between house prices and school quality in Australia for the first time. The answers are illuminating for parents and policy-makers alike.


As any real estate agent will confirm, when parents with school-aged children look for a house to buy, the quality of local public schools is often a key consideration. Just as house prices are higher when they are close to good parks, transport nodes and shops, they should also be higher when the quality of nearby schools is better. The question is: by how much?

To answer this question, we take advantage of the fact that public schools often have attendance zones with clear boundaries.

These boundaries mean that we can compare the price of houses that are close to one another but assigned to different schools. In other words, the only thing that differentiates the houses is the school that the children can attend.

We find that parents are willing to pay significantly more for a house assigned to a better quality public school. To send their children to a high school where the average Universities Admissions Index (also known as an ENTER or TER score) is five points higher, parents are willing to pay an extra 3.5 per cent for their home. This result is in line with previous studies that have analysed schools in Britain and the US.

If you want a house on the right side of the boundary line, you'll have to pay for it. And the differences aren't trivial.

Based on property prices in Canberra, where we draw our data, parents are willing to pay $13,000 extra to secure access to a house assigned to a better public school.


The implications of these findings are far reaching.

For the first time we know exactly how much value Australian parents place on better public education. Our results give the lie to those who suggest that all public schools are created equal. Parents recognise large gaps between non-government schools and are willing to pay to send their children to one public school rather than another.

Knowing the extent to which parents are willing to pay for better education is not only intrinsically important, it also allows policy-makers to make better decisions. It provides the means to rationally assess educational reforms aimed at higher achievement levels, by pitting the estimated costs of these policies against the estimated benefits. For example, a program targeted at improving outcomes in a particular school should raise house prices in its catchment area.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

First published in The Australian on August 24, 2006. Their paper is available here (pdf file 977KB).

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Ian Davidoff is a recent graduate of the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.

Andrew Leigh is the member for Fraser (ACT). Prior to his election in 2010, he was a professor in the Research School of Economics at the Australian National University, and has previously worked as associate to Justice Michael Kirby of the High Court of Australia, a lawyer for Clifford Chance (London), and a researcher for the Progressive Policy Institute (Washington DC). He holds a PhD from Harvard University and has published three books and over 50 journal articles. His books include Disconnected (2010), Battlers and Billionaires (2013) and The Economics of Just About Everything (2014).

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Ian Davidoff
All articles by Andrew Leigh

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy