Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Pride is a sideshow

By Mercurius Goldstein - posted Friday, 4 August 2006

The teaching of history in schools is currently in focus, so much so that on August 17, the Federal Government will sponsor a national history summit. No doubt some speechmakers will use it as a platform to bemoan the apparent lack of pride that many young (and not-so-young) Australians have in their country.

But in these days where personal responsibility is the yardstick by which all our actions are judged, why this haste to encourage schoolchildren to be proud of that which is not of their making? If we want our children to grow into adults who take full responsibility for their lives, then having them take pride from antecedent sources external to themselves - such as their nation and their cultural inheritance - seems a poor place to start.

A more ethical position would be to encourage schoolchildren to admire the achievements of their forebears, but not to take pride in them.


Admiration is much more, well, admirable, than pride.

Admiration contains within it the quality of humility, which is the antithesis of pride. When we admire the deeds of others, we implicitly acknowledge that which we lack in ourselves. Thus I admire the works of Shakespeare, Thucydides, Locke, Galileo, Newton, Darwin or Einstein, for I know my own mind falls way short of theirs. I can admire our Gallipoli veterans, for I don't know whether I, in the same situation, would possess their fortitude and physical courage. But how can I take pride for myself in their achievements?

To take pride is to take that which does not belong to us. It is cultural plagiarism. It is theft. Those who take pride in great thinkers, writers or leaders of history may think they are paying tribute, but in fact they are degrading their memory. For such pride usually manifests itself in bombast and triumphalism. The pride of Shakespeare, or our veterans, died with them. It is our admiration they deserve.

Thus I can admire, for example, the bravery inherent in explorers such as James Cook or Matthew Flinders and the men and women of the First Fleet. I can admire their ingenuity and endurance in the face of privations we can scarcely imagine. I can also admire those Indigenous warriors who resisted, and defended their land with violence; and the Indigenous leaders who attempted in vain to negotiate with those who invaded.

I can even admire the resourcefulness and courage it took for Europeans to scratch out a living on this continent. But I don't admire the fact that Europeans assumed control of this land without treating with the original owners. I don't admire the high-handed manner in which that occupation is referred to as "settlement" or "development", as though the culture it supplanted was unsettled or undeveloped. And I don't admire the obtuseness of those who consider such thinking to be a black-armband view of history.

As for pride? I take pride in none of it. Pride is a sideshow. Pride is unhistorical. Taking pride is a lickspittle's attempt to brand dissenters as unpatriotic.


To be sure, it is tempting to take pride from others, especially if we have little enough pride in our own achievements. And perhaps that is where we can redress the balance in our children. For why not take pride in our daily lives?

Life for most of us is a struggle, and much of what befalls us is beyond our control. How well we play the hand we are dealt is greater cause for pride than the hand itself. Perhaps if we felt more pride about that which we have wrought with our own hands, we would be less tempted by the shallow, tin-plated pride that politicians offer as a poor substitute for our intrinsic feelings of self-worth.

And perhaps one day when our children feel genuine pride in themselves, they will be better able to appraise and admire the greatness of others, without using it as a platform to assert a puffed-up superiority. Such proud children, who grow up tempered with ethics and humility, would truly be worthy of our admiration, if not our pride.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

51 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mercurius Goldstein is Head Teacher at an International School and is retained as a consultant at The University of Sydney as a teacher educator for visiting English language teachers. He is a recipient of the 2007 Outstanding Graduate award from the Australian College of Educators, holding the Bachelor of Education (Hons.1st Class) from The University of Sydney. He teaches Japanese language and ESL. These views are his own.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mercurius Goldstein

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Mercurius Goldstein
Article Tools
Comment 51 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy