Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

What a remarkable bargain

By David Flint - posted Tuesday, 1 August 2006

The British Government, and presumably the British taxpayer, has once again made a particularly handsome profit from the monarchy - over £147 million, that is about A$350 million. The profit increased this year by about £7 million, that is over A$16 million. Latest reports from the Crown Estate indicate the profit next year will be even larger.

The profit arises because of the income the British Government receives from the Crown Estate and certain other hereditary revenues. In return, the government funds the cost of the British monarchy, which last year was £37.4 million. Until 1760, the costs of the Crown were paid by the king directly from these revenues. From that time the practice developed where the sovereign agreed, for the term of his or her reign, to hand over these revenues to parliament in return for, what was called, the Civil List. Even with other grants-in-aid, this has proved to be a bargain, at least in the present reign.

For each Briton, this year the cost of the crown is about 62 pence per year. Balanced against this is the fact that the government received, for each Briton, about £3.10. In other words, the annual profit from the monarchy for each Briton is around £2.48. When the annual report on the royal finances was released in London on June 28, Keeper of the Privy Purse, Alan Reid, stressed this was “… the annual cost, not the daily, weekly or monthly cost”.


“We are pleased that the total cost of the monarchy is lower in real terms than it was in 2001,” he observed. “The reduction in the amount of head of state expenditure reflects the continuous attention the royal household pays to obtaining the best value for money in all areas of expenditure. In the current year there was a real increase of 1.4 per cent, which mainly arises from long-haul overseas visits, undertaken at the request of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.”

He said other increases had arisen because of increased security vetting needed in response to members of the media attempting to gain entrance to royal residences by deception and for Freedom of Information inquiries. You can just imagine the sort of inquiries from the armies of gossip columnists and embittered republicans.

The largest area of funding is the Property Grant-in-Aid, which meets the costs of property maintenance, utilities, telephones and related services of the occupied royal palaces. Its core funding will remain frozen at £15 million until 2008-09 when it will have remained at that level for ten years.

It has to be emphasised that the total cost of the monarchy does not include any salary or annuity for the Queen. This is a misconception at times encouraged by malevolent interests in the press and among republican politicians. They try, dishonestly, to create the impression that the monarchy diverts vast amounts of the taxpayers’ funds for the Queen’s personal use. The plain fact is that unlike a president, the Queen is not paid - these are funds to maintain the official residences, the staff, the entertainment, and ceremonial and other functions.

Nor is the Queen paid as head of the Commonwealth, nor as Queen of Australia, nor indeed as Queen of Canada, New Zealand or any other realm. I do not mention these facts, as one reader has suggested, to create sympathy for the Queen. It is merely to ensure that the truth, and not falsity, is propagated.

The profit realised by the British Government does not take into account the considerable tourist revenue for the UK which the monarchy no doubt attracts; nor, more important, the stability, which flows from the crown there and in countries as far apart geographically, but not constitutionally, as Canada and Australia.


Of the world's seven oldest continuing democracies, five are constitutional monarchies. Elizabeth II is Queen of four of these. And although the Queen has been our sovereign for over half the life of our Commonwealth of Australia, she has never asked for, nor have we ever paid anything for her service to the nation. For all of her realms the Queen remains an extraordinary bargain.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

14 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Flint is a former chairman of the Australian Press Council and the Australian Broadcasting Authority, is author of The Twilight of the Elites, and Malice in Media Land, published by Freedom Publishing. His latest monograph is Her Majesty at 80: Impeccable Service in an Indispensable Office, Australians for Constitutional Monarchy, Sydney, 2006

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Flint

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of David Flint
Article Tools
Comment 14 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from Australians for Constitutional Monarchy
 The formidable Fred Nile prevails: premier concedes
 Prorogue then intimidate
 The ‘Utegate’ affair and the constitution
 ETS: emissions trading scheme or energy tax swindle?
 Information and media manipulation par excellence

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy